Re: [graylog2] Re: Extractor and processing messages

Got it Thanks > On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:03 AM, Jochen Schalanda wrote: > > Hi Rayees, > > On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:00:05 UTC+1, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > I am looking extractor configuration, there i am not seeing any way to define > the input, without this all

Re: [graylog2] Re: Extractor and processing messages

Hi Rayees, On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:00:05 UTC+1, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > > I am looking extractor configuration, there i am not seeing any way to > define the input, without this all the messages comes to system will go > trough the extractor right ? I am missing something ? >

Re: [graylog2] Re: Extractor and processing messages

Regarding your second point I am looking extractor configuration, there i am not seeing any way to define the input, without this all the messages comes to system will go trough the extractor right ? I am missing something ? > On Feb 8, 2017, at 8:46 AM, Jochen Schalanda

[graylog2] Re: Extractor and processing messages

Hi Rayees, On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 17:38:56 UTC+1, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > > Suppose i have defined 10 extractors and if any messages comes to graylog > this go trough all the 10 extractors ? > This depends on your configuration and if the preconditions for these extractors have