> I'm doing some calculation for the gini index and I noticed some small
> differences between the gretl's built-in command and the step-by-step
> calculation on P and L. Any suggestion?
I've got it! Don't mind! Sorry ! :(
Artur
Dear Allin,
I'm doing some calculation for the gini index and I noticed some small
differences between the gretl's built-in command and the step-by-step
calculation on P and L. Any suggestion?
Best, artur
gretl 0,414005424*073137*
without (0,0) 0,414005424*256711*
including (0,0) 0,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, artur bala wrote:
> I'm doing some calculation for the gini index and I noticed some small
> differences between the gretl's built-in command and the step-by-step
> calculation on P and L. Any suggestion?
What's "P and L"?
Allin Cottrell
Thanks for that Allin.
I thought I'd clarify the point regarding the autocorrelation test which was
unclear in my previous email. The sample period 1985:01 to 2009:04 is chosen
for specific reasons relating to stability and floating of the exchange
rate. If the autocorrelation test (automatic) aux
Hi all,
I've been using the modtest --autocorr option to test for autocorrelation in
a VAR model. I set the sample 1985 01 - 2009 04 (100 observations). The
automatic test and the manually specified LM test calculation do not yield
the same result because the former (automatic) uses observations (
Hello everyone! Can somebody help me?
I would like to ask a couple of things about gretl software:
1. Does it support GPU acceleration?
2. Does it support distributed networking? (running the same program in
parallel computing to speed up the process.)
Your answer is highly appreciated.
Thank
Am 12.10.2011 05:37, schrieb Muheed Jamaldeen:
>
> And using the var option in Gretl what's the best way to specify
> heterogeneous (in variables) equation structure? (e.g. to impose block
> exogeniety for a small open economy VAR)
>
> eg.
> Y = Y-1 + X-1 + Z-1
> X= X-1 + Z-1
> Z=X-1 + Z-1
>
>
>> > I'm computing some poverty measures on different subpopulation.
>> > Before I reinvent the wheel, is there a function to produce a cross
>> > tabulation output like this one (including the strings)?
> Have you looked at the "xtab" command?
Well, I apologize Allin. I made a confusion there.
