On Wed, 23 May 2012, Sven Schreiber wrote:
> Am 22.05.2012 23:42, schrieb Allin Cottrell:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012, Claudio Shikida wrote:
>>
>>> Here is a strange thing. I took the real GDP per capita (chain) from China
>>> and USA (Penn World Tables, Gretl, Database). I used the whole sample
>>>
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Claudio Shikida wrote:
> Here is a strange thing. I took the real GDP per capita (chain) from China
> and USA (Penn World Tables, Gretl, Database). I used the whole sample
> (1950-2004, if I am not wrong)
>
> So I started a basic work with time series. I applied an ADF test
This works fine, Ignacio! Thanks for your help!
Artur
2012/5/22 Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
> Artur:
>
> I think this is a problem with the way in that 'loop foreach' treats
> its arguments: probably first if they are two or more arguments all of
> them are treated as strings, for a unique
Hello
Here is a strange thing. I took the real GDP per capita (chain) from China
and USA (Penn World Tables, Gretl, Database). I used the whole sample
(1950-2004, if I am not wrong)
So I started a basic work with time series. I applied an ADF test in the
China's variable using constant and
Artur:
I think this is a problem with the way in that 'loop foreach' treats
its arguments: probably first if they are two or more arguments all of
them are treated as strings, for a unique argument it checks if it is a
list or a string and act different in each case. A solution may be:
open
Dear gretl mailing list,
I want to generate strings containing the names of the variables within the
respective list. For an individual list it works properly:
open denmark
list ttt = LRM IBO
loop foreach i ttt
sprintf astr "%11s", "$i"
print astr
endloop
But for a loop
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Anutechia Asongu wrote:
> I have a little qualm. I'm using System-GMM to model a
> hypothesis. The 'asymptotic standard error' option eases the
> significance of estimated coefficients. Is there a 'thumb rule'
> for the inclusion for this option?
The rule of thumb is
On Mon, 21 May 2012, artur tarassow wrote:
> I tried to access the LR-test test statistics and p-value for (G)ARCH terms
> after estimating a GARCH like this:
>
>
> open b-g.gdt
> dY = diff(Y)
> garch 1 1 ; dY const --stdresid
>
>
> but I could not find any accessors.
I guess we could use the
Hi All,
I have a little qualm. I'm using System-GMM to model a hypothesis.
The 'asymptotic standard error' option eases the significance of estimated
coefficients. Is there a 'thumb rule' for the inclusion for this option?
Cheers
Hi All,
