Sorry Allin...still nothing :(
> Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 13:36:43 -0400
> From: cottrell(a)wfu.edu
> To: gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] Gretl crashes
>
> On Sat, 4 May 2013, Manny B wrote:
>
> > Thnx Allin : You're right...the sample size is still
> > small and thus
Greetings all,
Please might I give two bob's worth of support for XP Pro.
I have found it to be very very stable. It runs just about everything I
throw at
it, from compiled F90 through R and Gretl and 2 screens, to compiled
GWBasicprograms with big powerful recursion, too, generating
very big
Ok, maybe now I understood how to read the FEVD matrix from the SVAR
function.
It is shown exactly in the same way as the FEVD from the "conventional"
VAR, isn't it?
I was thinking that the first p columns from the SVAR FEVD were the
percentage of variance error explained by the first shock. But ac
Thank you for your answer Allin. I know that the exposition form is
different. But I get different numbers as well.. the same shock explains
different shares. I don't know why is this so..
On 04/05/2013 2:13 PM, "Allin Cottrell" wrote:
> On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
>
> > In this wa
In this way they are the same.. that is a bad news for me! So via gui the
fevd is not right?
On 04/05/2013 1:18 PM, "Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti"
wrote:
> On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>>
>> I have notice a great difference between the fevd matrices of the Var
>> estima
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Manny B wrote:
> Thnx Allin : You're right...the sample size is still
> small and thus not representative ;)You can count on my
> help!
I've now (in today's snapshot) tried a new build of the GTK
stack, sticking more closely to the recipe used in building
the "known go
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have notice a great difference between the fevd matrices of the Var
> estimated via model -> time series -> var and the Svar estimated via
> console.
>
> Someone could help me to understand why is it so?
Weird.
Try this. Do the FEVD ma
Dear all,
I have notice a great difference between the fevd matrices of the Var
estimated via model -> time series -> var and the Svar estimated via
console.
Someone could help me to understand why is it so?
Thank you
Gabriela
Dear all,
I have notice a great difference between the fevd matrice
I have two xp Windows computers a laptop and a portable. But until monday
impossible to try nothing. It is posible to know when crashes exactly???
José Perles
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El 04/05/2013, a las 10:16, Manny B escribió:
> Thnx Allin : You're right...the sample size is still sma
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Manny B wrote:
>> Hold on -- we're econometricians; I'm grateful to Yi-Nung and Sven
>> for testing, but a sample size of 3 cannot yield definitive results.
>> Some bugs are sneaky, only manifesting themselves under certain
>> conditions. If we had 10 tests on Windows XP with o
Thnx Allin : You're right...the sample size is still small and thus not
representative ;)You can count on my help! For now I will continue with
checking my computer for possible errors.Manny
> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 20:20:17 -0400
> From: cottrell(a)wfu.edu
> To: gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
> Thank you for your answer Allin. I know that the exposition form is
> different. But I get different numbers as well.. the same shock explains
> different shares. I don't know why is this so..
Well, can you give us an example where you're seeing differ
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti wrote:
> On Sat, 4 May 2013, Manny B wrote:
>
>>> Hold on -- we're econometricians; I'm grateful to Yi-Nung and Sven
>>> for testing, but a sample size of 3 cannot yield definitive results.
>>> Some bugs are sneaky, only manifesting themselves under ce
On Sat, 4 May 2013, Gabriela Nodari wrote:
> In this way they are the same.. that is a bad news for me! So via gui the
> fevd is not right?
The _presentation_ of the FEVD is different in the GUI, in three
ways:
1) for a VAR with p variables, the results are divided into p
blocks, as opposed t
Just to increase the sample size ;).
I have installed current snapshot (PT language), ran an OLS, maximized main
window, moved model 1 window, no problems.
Windows XP, Version 2002 Service Pack 3.
Intel Core2Duo.
ATI Radeon HD 4200 Series @1024x768 32bit
Allin, I did however, got a partial cras
15 matches
Mail list logo
