On Fri, 2 May 2014, Tim Nall wrote:
> All,
>
> Again please refer to previous disclaimers about the fact that I
> certainly and truly have no idea what I am talking about w. respect to
> statistics, and perhaps with respect to other issues as well.
>
> In an earlier post, someone or other expresse
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Tim Nall wrote:
> In an earlier post (with a different subject line) I mentioned that
> the SVAR graphs could be more informative by adding "IRF by shock" and
> IRF by var". That same principle might apply to adding the model
> option to the graph title, e.g., "Plain model" or
More unfortunate news. I manually deleted the last 5 rows off the entire
data file (can live without them), thinking that would solve my problem,
and you could fix tramolin in your spare time. No, sorry, even with the
last rows populated now, it still crashes, though nobser has changed to 186
in mo
Sorry, no, it doesn't. In the file upload box, tramolin did display as "Not
up to date" before I downloaded it, so it seems I got the new copy. This
one is 1.6 ... I tried with a file that had zeroes, and with another file
that had empty cells .. both crashed.. if it helps, it seems that xint.t is
First, I was wrong. Changing the sample range doesn't help. Perhaps I
clicked the wrong var the second time.
Second, I use a file editor to look at the 6 files in
\Application Data\gretl\tramo\graph\series
...they have nobs (number observations) equal to 190; should be 196.
The reason the progra
Non Parametric tests do this . Any book on Research methodology do that
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Tim Nall wrote:
> I don't want to talk too much, but I have read that there are some
> goals/tests for which a which a normal data distribution is not
> important, and others for which it ver
Discussion of assumptions is a question of econometrics and is not sofware
specific. But, may be, some of me experience would be interesting.
I modeled well behaved (in the other senses) cross-sectional data for
regression with power-law disturbances. (I admire Taleb, but don't agree with
him
I think everyone is allowed to write her (oh, or his) own book on gretl if it
is duly referenced to the gretl team
--- Оригінальне повідомлення ---
Від кого: "Tim Nall" < tnall.ling(a)gmail.com >
Дата: 2 травня 2014, 06:26:04
All,
Again please refer to previous disclaimers about the fact t
I don't want to talk too much, but I have read that there are some
goals/tests for which a which a normal data distribution is not
important, and others for which it very definitely is. And my
suggestion would be, if a book did exist: put that and similar
information on page 1 of every chapter, in
On 02/05/14 12:01, Tim Nall wrote:
> Sorry, no, it doesn't. In the file upload box, tramolin did display as
> "Not up to date" before I downloaded it, so it seems I got the new
> copy. This one is 1.6 ... I tried with a file that had zeroes, and
> with another file that had empty cells .. both c
On 02/05/14 11:20, Tim Nall wrote:
> First, I was wrong. Changing the sample range doesn't help. Perhaps I
> clicked the wrong var the second time.
>
> Second, I use a file editor to look at the 6 files in
> \Application Data\gretl\tramo\graph\series
>
> ...they have nobs (number observations) equ
On 01/05/14 10:37, Tim Nall wrote:
> Series has zeroes from time to time, including four in a row in the
> last four observations. I restricted the data to a sample with far
> fewer zeroes, and did not receive the same error. TMN
>
>
Tramolin uses 'append' to retrieve the "linear series" (adjusted
All,
Again please refer to previous disclaimers about the fact that I
certainly and truly have no idea what I am talking about w. respect to
statistics, and perhaps with respect to other issues as well.
In an earlier post, someone or other expressed a concern that gretl
might be perceived as a t
In an earlier post (with a different subject line) I mentioned that
the SVAR graphs could be more informative by adding "IRF by shock" and
IRF by var". That same principle might apply to adding the model
option to the graph title, e.g., "Plain model" or "KPSW Model."
And at a higher level of menu
If it is not undue intervention as an humble student of Econometrics ( I am
70 years old ) I feel The various assumptions about Normal Distribution
are hardly met in real life data. If one has sound theory yest there is no
co integration of data or unit root is present then there are two golden
w
15 matches
Mail list logo
