[Gretl-users] Compiling Gretl on RHEL 5

2014-09-10 Thread Charles Gagnon
I support gretl for a group who uses it, so I don't use it myself. But I'm running into issues compiling and installing. I'm trying to deploy the latest gretl-1.9.91 on a RHEL 5.9 box. The configure script complains that: Please install glib-2.0 >= 2.12.0 and then reconfigure gretl. glib-2.0 is

Re: [Gretl-users] Compiling Gretl on RHEL 5

2014-09-10 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Charles Gagnon wrote: > I support gretl for a group who uses it, so I don't use it myself. But I'm > running into issues compiling and installing. > > I'm trying to deploy the latest gretl-1.9.91 on a RHEL 5.9 box. > > The configure script complains that: > > Please install gl

Re: [Gretl-users] non-linear wald test

2014-09-10 Thread Jack
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Artur T. wrote: > For the first two I obtain exactly the same results using either gretl's > internal function or mine. However, for the third one I obtain an error > as the standard errors of the non-linear long-run coefficients > > lrse = sqrt(qform(fb,vcv)) > > cannot be com

Re: [Gretl-users] non-linear wald test

2014-09-10 Thread Artur T .
Thanks for the reply, Riccardo. I am aware of this, but I am a bit puzzled why it works using gretl's restrict command for this specific case I described (restricton three). I am wondered why my function yields the same results for the first two restrictions but not for the third one. How does gret

Re: [Gretl-users] non-linear wald test

2014-09-10 Thread Jack
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Artur T. wrote: > Thanks for the reply, Riccardo. I am aware of this, but I am a bit > puzzled why it works using gretl's restrict command for this specific > case I described (restricton three). I am wondered why my function > yields the same results for the first two restric

Re: [Gretl-users] non-linear wald test

2014-09-10 Thread Artur T .
Ah ok, this might be a good hint. I'll check this out. Artur Am 10.09.2014 um 21:25 schrieb Riccardo (Jack) Lucchetti: > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Artur T. wrote: > >> Thanks for the reply, Riccardo. I am aware of this, but I am a bit >> puzzled why it works using gretl's restrict command for this sp