Re: [Gretl-users] Possible redundancy of some function packages?

2014-12-01 Thread Marcin Błażejowski
Hi, this is what I have in my mind for few months: 1. TAGs. We should work out a coherent system of TAGs (beside the dataset type and version). I my opinion it would be something like this: 1st level TAG - general functionality: estimator, test, other(?). 2nd level TAG - area of usage: sta

Re: [Gretl-users] functions on Gretl server: trivial suggestion

2014-12-01 Thread Jack
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014, Stefano Fachin wrote: > Given that the issue of the functions available on the server is currently > debated I add a (very) trivial suggestion that may add some usability at zero > cost. Since the number of functions available is growing, and will hopefully > grow even more

[Gretl-users] functions on Gretl server: trivial suggestion

2014-12-01 Thread Stefano Fachin
Given that the issue of the functions available on the server is currently debated I add a (very) trivial suggestion that may add some usability at zero cost. Since the number of functions available is growing, and will hopefully grow even more rapidly, it would be useful to set the standard of