Re: [Gretl-users] Exact collinearity and modprint

2011-11-04 Thread Giuseppe Vittucci
Thanks a lot. Giuseppe To Allin: The regression is actually just a FE panel data model, but it follows a concentrated NLS to estimate a Panel Smooth Transition Regression model. So, I would like to have more control on the output (s.e. and statistics). On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:14 +0100,

Re: [Gretl-users] Exact collinearity and modprint

2011-11-03 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Giuseppe Vittucci wrote: > when in a regression one or more variables are omitted due to exact > collinearity, the command modprint leads to misleading results cause the > initial list of regressors does not match the vector of coefficients > returned by gretl. > > Is there a

Re: [Gretl-users] Exact collinearity and modprint

2011-11-03 Thread Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
El 03/11/11 10:31, Giuseppe Vittucci escribió: > Dear all, > > when in a regression one or more variables are omitted due to exact > collinearity, the command modprint leads to misleading results cause the > initial list of regressors does not match the vector of coefficients > returned by gretl.

[Gretl-users] Exact collinearity and modprint

2011-11-03 Thread Giuseppe Vittucci
Dear all, when in a regression one or more variables are omitted due to exact collinearity, the command modprint leads to misleading results cause the initial list of regressors does not match the vector of coefficients returned by gretl. Is there a way to retrieve the list of regressors dropped