Hadiwibowo
- Original Message
From: Allin Cottrell
To: Gretl list
Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 2:31:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] sub-sampling panel data to time series
The problem was this: the fact that the dataset was sub-sampled
was not being recorded on the model produced
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Yuniarto Hadiwibowo wrote:
> I am trying to run restrict command on time series from panel
> sub-sample, but I got the message "Can't do: the current data
> set is different from the one on which the reference model was
> estimated dataset is subsampled, model is not."
Thank
et
smpl code=$i --restrict --replace
printf "\n\nCode $i\n"
ols rd 0 rf --robust
restrict
b2=1
end restrict
end loop
- Original Message
From: Sven Schreiber
To: Gretl list
Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 9:23:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] sub-sampling panel data
Allin,
Allin,
I'm not sure I understand...
Allin Cottrell schrieb:
>
> 3) However, the requirement at point 2 is in a sense "formal":
> some of the time-series observations may be composed of NA
> (missing) values.
ok, so it's not really a balanced panel then in the usual sense of the
term, right?
>
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, artur bala wrote:
> Allin Cottrell a écrit :
>
> I have now (in CVS) changed the behavior of smpl --restrict so
> that it doesn't strive to produce a balanced panel
>
> It works fine! Thanks!
>
> unless you give the new --balanced option.
>
> What still intrigues me when u
Allin Cottrell a écrit :
I have now (in CVS) changed the behavior of smpl --restrict so
that it doesn't strive to produce a balanced panel
It works fine! Thanks!
unless you give the new --balanced option.
What still intrigues me when using the --balanced
flag is that the number o
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, artur bala wrote:
> I'm sorry people but I'm feeling lost. I thought the data were
> the problem but it seems not.
>
> Can you please run this script on my data and find out what's
> wrong with these topsy-turvy missing values? thanx a bunch!
When you do
smpl FRS=0 --rest
artur bala schrieb:
> I'm sorry people but I'm feeling lost. I thought the data were the
> problem but it seems not.
> Can you please run this script on my data and find out what's wrong with
> these topsy-turvy missing values? thanx a bunch!
> artur
>
yes it looks strange to me too, may well be
I'm sorry people but I'm feeling lost. I thought the data were the
problem but it seems not.
Can you please run this script on my data and find out what's wrong
with these topsy-turvy missing values? thanx a bunch!
artur
Thank
you Sven,
I now see where's the problem. It's the dummy variable
Thank you Sven,
I now see where's the problem. It's the dummy variable containing some
missing values instead of zeros. Sorry!
best,
artur
artur bala a écrit :
Sven Schreiber a écrit :
artur.bala schrieb:
Hello,
I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and
Sven Schreiber a écrit :
> artur.bala schrieb:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and want to sub-sample on a
>> dummy variable which has no mising values throughout the full sample. Is
>> it normal that the outcome contain many empty observations?
>>
>>
> Or do yo
artur.bala schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and want to sub-sample on a
> dummy variable which has no mising values throughout the full sample. Is
> it normal that the outcome contain many empty observations?
>
not sure I understand -- do you mean there are missing
Laposte.net vous souhaite de Joyeuses Fêtes de fin d'année.
Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net
Hello,I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and want to sub-sample on a dummy variable which has no mising values throughout the full sample. Is it normal that the outcome contain many empty obse
13 matches
Mail list logo
