Laposte.net vous souhaite de Joyeuses Fêtes de fin d'année.
Je crée ma boîte mail www.laposte.net
Hello,I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and want to sub-sample on a dummy variable which has no mising values throughout the full sample. Is it normal that the outcome contain many empty obse
artur.bala schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and want to sub-sample on a
> dummy variable which has no mising values throughout the full sample. Is
> it normal that the outcome contain many empty observations?
>
not sure I understand -- do you mean there are missing
Sven Schreiber a écrit :
> artur.bala schrieb:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and want to sub-sample on a
>> dummy variable which has no mising values throughout the full sample. Is
>> it normal that the outcome contain many empty observations?
>>
>>
> Or do yo
Thank you Sven,
I now see where's the problem. It's the dummy variable containing some
missing values instead of zeros. Sorry!
best,
artur
artur bala a écrit :
Sven Schreiber a écrit :
artur.bala schrieb:
Hello,
I'm working with an unbalanced panel data and
I'm sorry people but I'm feeling lost. I thought the data were the
problem but it seems not.
Can you please run this script on my data and find out what's wrong
with these topsy-turvy missing values? thanx a bunch!
artur
Thank
you Sven,
I now see where's the problem. It's the dummy variable
artur bala schrieb:
> I'm sorry people but I'm feeling lost. I thought the data were the
> problem but it seems not.
> Can you please run this script on my data and find out what's wrong with
> these topsy-turvy missing values? thanx a bunch!
> artur
>
yes it looks strange to me too, may well be
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, artur bala wrote:
> I'm sorry people but I'm feeling lost. I thought the data were
> the problem but it seems not.
>
> Can you please run this script on my data and find out what's
> wrong with these topsy-turvy missing values? thanx a bunch!
When you do
smpl FRS=0 --rest
Allin Cottrell a écrit :
I have now (in CVS) changed the behavior of smpl --restrict so
that it doesn't strive to produce a balanced panel
It works fine! Thanks!
unless you give the new --balanced option.
What still intrigues me when using the --balanced
flag is that the number o
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, artur bala wrote:
> Allin Cottrell a écrit :
>
> I have now (in CVS) changed the behavior of smpl --restrict so
> that it doesn't strive to produce a balanced panel
>
> It works fine! Thanks!
>
> unless you give the new --balanced option.
>
> What still intrigues me when u
Allin,
I'm not sure I understand...
Allin Cottrell schrieb:
>
> 3) However, the requirement at point 2 is in a sense "formal":
> some of the time-series observations may be composed of NA
> (missing) values.
ok, so it's not really a balanced panel then in the usual sense of the
term, right?
>
et
smpl code=$i --restrict --replace
printf "\n\nCode $i\n"
ols rd 0 rf --robust
restrict
b2=1
end restrict
end loop
- Original Message
From: Sven Schreiber
To: Gretl list
Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 9:23:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] sub-sampling panel data
Allin,
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Yuniarto Hadiwibowo wrote:
> I am trying to run restrict command on time series from panel
> sub-sample, but I got the message "Can't do: the current data
> set is different from the one on which the reference model was
> estimated dataset is subsampled, model is not."
Thank
Hadiwibowo
- Original Message
From: Allin Cottrell
To: Gretl list
Sent: Sat, December 19, 2009 2:31:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Gretl-users] sub-sampling panel data to time series
The problem was this: the fact that the dataset was sub-sampled
was not being recorded on the model produced
13 matches
Mail list logo
