On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
> Hm, all grml versions? ;)
yup, it appears so! :)
thanks, I'm downloading now.
--
Josh Lawrence
http://www.hardbop200.com
___
Grml mailing list - Grml@mur.at
http://lists.mur.at/mailman/listinf
* Josh Lawrence [20090312 22:53]:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
> >> Going forward, will the PREEMPT configuration option remain as standard in
> >> grml or might that just suddenly change?
> holy crap, I can't believe I missed this!!!
> what version(s) of grml suppor
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Prokop wrote:
>> Going forward, will the PREEMPT configuration option remain as standard in
>> grml or might that just suddenly change?
holy crap, I can't believe I missed this!!!
what version(s) of grml support the PREEMPT option? (i.e., stable or
devel
* Lars-Erik Helander [20090308 16:50]:
> I have been using grml for a couple of days and I am very happy with it so
> far.
> The reason I started to use grml was that I discovered that the grml kernel
> was configured with the PREEMPT option.
> This makes it suitable for audio applications and ev
I have been using grml for a couple of days and I am very happy with it so
far.
The reason I started to use grml was that I discovered that the grml kernel
was configured with the PREEMPT option.
This makes it suitable for audio applications and even if the preempt
characteristics you get with an R
