Re: [Grml] Request for Comments / Poll: removal of LaTeX on grml

2009-06-16 Thread Maurice McCarthy
Tried several times to connect to this poll but server must be down, I guess. I have no problem with removing latex. Regards Moss On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 01:01:09AM +0200 or thereabouts, Michael Prokop wrote: Michael Prokop m...@grml.org wrote: I'd like to know *your* opinion on this

Re: [Grml] Request for Comments / Poll: removal of LaTeX on grml

2009-06-16 Thread Michael Prokop
* Maurice McCarthy m...@mythic-beasts.com [20090616 11:28]: Tried several times to connect to this poll but server must be down, I guess. Yeah, doodle seems to have serious problems with upgrading their systems. Very bad timing for us, I'm sorry. :( I have no problem with removing latex.

Re: [Grml] Request for Comments / Poll: removal of LaTeX on grml

2009-06-16 Thread Michael Whapples
As a live CD I have no problem with removing LaTeX as I normally use it as a rescue system. When I normally need LaTeX I will be using a HD installation (whatever distro it happens to be) and so LaTeX can be installed easily from a package repository if not available. For the few times where

[Grml] Request for Comments / Poll: removal of LaTeX on grml

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Prokop
Hi grml users, especially on grml64 we are running out of space and I'm thinking about removing LaTeX from grml, which would save us 100MB of uncompressed space. I'm talking about the following Debian packages: | auctex catdvi ctioga dvipng gnuhtml2latex lacheck latex-beamer | latexmk latex-mk

Re: [Grml] Request for Comments / Poll: removal of LaTeX on grml

2009-06-15 Thread Michael Prokop
* Jason White ja...@jasonjgw.net [20090615 13:44]: Michael Prokop m...@grml.org wrote: I'd like to know *your* opinion on this issue, so please let us know your opinion through this poll: http://doodle.com/3dnzvhv43tmhpcpn This opens up a broader issue: are you considering a version