On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library function,
to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open the gate to a
possible pdfbb request, which gtroff.exe could process internally.
Alternatively, we could modify
On 21-Sep-2014 10:52:38 Deri James wrote:
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library function,
to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open the gate to a
possible pdfbb request, which gtroff.exe could process
On 21/09/14 11:52, Deri James wrote:
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 06:38:42 Werner LEMBERG wrote:
A good starting point may be to implement a C/C++ library function,
to extract the MediaBox properties; that would open the gate to a
possible pdfbb request, which gtroff.exe could process internally.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 03:29:18PM +0100, Keith Marshall wrote:
Yes, it is. Someone on the list has contacted me, with a view to writing
the
code,
Who might that be? If it was off-list, then we have a problem -- we all
need to be kept in the picture, with this sort of stuff. I ask
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 15:29:18 Keith Marshall wrote:
Good idea!
Yes, it is. Someone on the list has contacted me, with a view to writing
the code,
Who might that be? If it was off-list, then we have a problem -- we all
need to be kept in the picture, with this sort of stuff. I ask
Hello Werner and all the list,
On Mon, Sep 08 2014 at 08:11:04 AM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
I've just pushed a new branch 'automake2' (branched from master at
commit 985b1eacaf24981f29bb4a5d53b8961dbafcdfef, about a month ago)
where I split my original work into smaller commits. It's
On 21/09/14 20:04, Deri James wrote:
I'm glad that Ulrich has answered you, it was not my place to
identify the person as they contacted me privately,
Sure, but we must strenuously discourage such private communications;
how on earth can we expect to effectively co-ordinate development, if
On 21/09/14 20:50, Keith Marshall wrote:
I'd be happy to send you the same email I sent to Ulrich but the
email address;-
Keith Marshall keithmarsh...@users.sourceforge.net
Bounces my emails
Strange. It is working, but may be faulting intermittently; I'll log an
issue with
On Thu, Sep 18 2014 at 01:41:50 AM, Dave Kemper saint.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it an oversight that the Mission Statement section of the project
page (http://www.gnu.org/software/groff/#mission-statement) contains
only two of the three groff source files needed to produce the
formatted
Thanks a lot for your answers Ralph, Ingo and Dale.
I got all what I need
Cheers, Greg
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2014 à 14:15 +0100, Ralph Corderoy a écrit :
Hi Ingo,
To mitigate that situation, i think it would help a bit to include a
link to http://www.schaffter.ca/mom/mom-04.html (that
Von: Bertrand Garrigues bertrand.garrig...@laposte.net
With commit a88127a4fecb307f26f2e217213d4a90e300d220 the automake2
branch is now ready for more testing from other members of the list.
git clone git://git.savannah.gnu.org/groff.git
git checkout automake2
./bootstrap
mkdir build
Von: Bertrand Garrigues bertrand.garrig...@laposte.net
Then you can check in the TESTS file for the other targets. Please note
that compared to the current build system:
- There are 2 new targets, 'make check' and 'make distcheck'
- Parallel build is supported.
With both checks I got
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 20:50:37 Keith Marshall wrote:
On 21/09/14 20:04, Deri James wrote:
I'm glad that Ulrich has answered you, it was not my place to
identify the person as they contacted me privately,
Sure, but we must strenuously discourage such private communications;
how on earth can
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014, Deri James wrote:
On Sun 21 Sep 2014 20:50:37 Keith Marshall wrote:
On 21/09/14 20:04, Deri James wrote:
I'm glad that Ulrich has answered you, it was not my place to
identify the person as they contacted me privately,
Sure, but we must strenuously discourage
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014, Keith Marshall wrote:
On 18/09/14 14:42, Peter Schaffter wrote:
Would an addition to the warning emitted by the macro be sufficient
to alert users to the potential dangers of -U?
Perhaps, but it's so much better if it can be avoided altogether. FWIW,
in my former
Sorry not to get back on this right away. I've been away for a
couple of days--work and computer free!
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
I am loking for an easy documentation about -mom.
This documentation should discribe how -mom macros are working.
Have you seen
16 matches
Mail list logo
