On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 07:17:59PM +0100, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
> Ralph Corderoy wrote on Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 11:28:40AM +:
> > Ingo:
> >> Ralph:
> >>> Ingo:
> Ralph:
>
[...]
> The printf(1) utility is already used in
>
> * Makefile.in (5 places)
> * bootstrap (8 places
Hi Peter,
Peter Schaffter wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 05:22:19PM -0500:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Peter Schaffter wrote:
>>> Neither am I. What I know about texifo wouldn't fit in a thimble.
>> You mean it would, right? Put it in there, and enough space will
>> probably
Hi Bertrand,
Bertrand Garrigues wrote on Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:59:24AM +0100:
> On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 01:59:11 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Then, the test that the gnulib hypot module is supposed to replace
>> intends to test whether the function needs to be *declared*. In
>> the past, our bu
Hi Ingo,
On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 01:59:11 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Then, the test that the gnulib hypot module is supposed to replace
> intends to test whether the function needs to be *declared*. In
> the past, our build system did not provide any replacement code for
> a missing hypot() objec
At 2018-12-10T00:43:39+0100, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 12:15:20 AM, "G. Branden Robinson"
> wrote:
> > At 2018-12-09T01:02:19+0100, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
> >> > I'm attaching the fix to the "POSITIONS FROM INSTALLATION" section
> >> > (which I would like to rename--it
On Sun, Dec 09 2018 at 12:15:20 AM, "G. Branden Robinson"
wrote:
> At 2018-12-09T01:02:19+0100, Bertrand Garrigues wrote:
>> > I'm attaching the fix to the "POSITIONS FROM INSTALLATION" section
>> > (which I would like to rename--it's pretty awkward English), and below
>> > please find a 'git log
On Fri, Dec 07, 2018, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> > Neither am I. What I know about texifo wouldn't fit in a thimble.
>
> You mean it would, right? Put it in there, and enough space will
> probably be left to fit in my knowledge of textinfo, as well.
Is the fact the we both mistyped 'texinfo' eviden
Hi Ingo,
On Sunday, 9 December 2018 13:14:58 GMT Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Did you intentionally not credit Ralph with the idea?
No. but my thanks was directed to both of you. :-)
> Whoever commits next can remove the stray blank line that was
> accidentally introduced into the ChangeLog; i don't t
Hi Ingo,
> > > To confirm this, i just commented out the line
> > >
> > > double hypot(double, double);
> > >
> > > in /usr/include/math.h
...
> > > The lack of hypot() in libm is *not* detected
>
> > Did you remove hypot() from libm.a too?
>
> No i didn't.
...
> Then, the test that the gnulib h
Hi Bertrand, hi Ralph,
Ralph Corderoy wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 10:36:25AM +:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Ouch. My first attempt to fix this with "test -n" failed miserably:
>>
>> [...]
>> if test -n ""; then \
>> for f in ; do \
>> cp -f $f /home/schwarze/Local9/share/man/ma
Hi Deri,
Deri wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 12:50:48PM +:
> On Sunday, 9 December 2018 00:53:48 GMT Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> Ralph Corderoy suggested using
>>
>> unpack('V'
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> unpack('L<'
>>
>> and that works for me on OpenBSD, Debian Jessie, Solaris 11, 10, and 9.
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Corderoy wrote on Sun, Dec 09, 2018 at 11:09:51AM +:
> Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> To confirm this, i just commented out the line
>>
>> double hypot(double, double);
>>
>> in /usr/include/math.h
> ...
>> CXX src/libs/libgroff/libgroff_a-hypot.o
>> ../src/libs/libgroff
On Sunday, 9 December 2018 00:53:48 GMT Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Ralph Corderoy suggested using
>
> unpack('V'
>
> instead of
>
> unpack('L<'
>
> and that works for me on OpenBSD, Debian Jessie, Solaris 11, 10, and 9.
Hi Ingo, Ralph,
Suggested change has been committed, mary thanks for your
Hi Ingo,
> To confirm this, i just commented out the line
>
> double hypot(double, double);
>
> in /usr/include/math.h
...
> CXX src/libs/libgroff/libgroff_a-hypot.o
> ../src/libs/libgroff/hypot.cpp:
> In function 'double groff_hypot(double, double)':
> ../src/libs/libgroff/hypo
Hi Ingo,
> Ouch. My first attempt to fix this with "test -n" failed miserably:
>
> [...]
> if test -n ""; then \
> for f in ; do \
> cp -f $f /home/schwarze/Local9/share/man/man5/g`basename $f`; \
> done; \
> fi
> bash: -c: line 2: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
The
15 matches
Mail list logo
