RE: man Macro Package and pdfmark

2020-02-14 Thread Jeff Conrad
Ingo, > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2020 10:46 AM > > .am SH > > .pdfbookmark 1 "\&\\$*" > > .. > > .am SS > > .pdfbookmark 2 "\&\\$*" > > .. > > Just don't do that. Never use low-level roff stuff in manual pages, > don't even think about it. This makes your manual pages non-portable. I'm not

Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark

2020-02-14 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Ingo Schwarze wrote in <20200214184532.gj92...@athene.usta.de>: |Hi Jeff, | |Jeff Conrad wrote on Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:45:10PM -0800: | |> A major drawback to manual pages formatted using the man macros is the |> lack of bookmarks in a PDF file. A quick and dirty way to get bookmarks |>

Re: man Macro Package and pdfmark

2020-02-14 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Jeff, Jeff Conrad wrote on Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 03:45:10PM -0800: > A major drawback to manual pages formatted using the man macros is the > lack of bookmarks in a PDF file. A quick and dirty way to get bookmarks > appears to be adding > > .am SH > .pdfbookmark 1 "\&\\$*" > .. > .am SS > .pd

Re: Do you use the test-groff script?

2020-02-14 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Dave, Dave Kemper wrote on Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 08:38:05PM -0600: > If you use test-groff, *Please don't!* > would you find the script more useful, less useful, or unchanged > in its usefulness if it were to honor your current environment's > settings of GROFF_BIN_PATH, GROFF_FONT_PATH, and