On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 05:59:16PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Update of bug #59424 (project groff):
>
> Status:None => Confirmed
> Assigned to:None => gbranden
>
>
Branden,
That's a pretty good guide. Thank you for your effort!
When you say points are '(about 1/72")', it probably doesn't hurt to go the
extra mile (!) in precision and say '(1/72.27")'. It's shorter (no need for
'about') and more correct. Also I would spell out inches here, as the
Update of bug #57855 (project groff):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish
Summary: doc/webpage.ms: NEWS VERSION 1.22.4 is missing =>
doc/webpage.ms: modify it to make it more obviously an example
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #59425 (project groff):
Changing the names of macro packages to avoid conflicts only makes sense as
long as you have a concept of portable macro packages *and* you desire
alternative implementations of standard macro packages to work with the same
roff implementation.
