On Sat, 05 Dec 2020 13:35:09 -0500,
Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 3. Downgrade the error to a warning.
>
> This seems reasonable, given the current nop behaviour, which
> groffers expect. It is useful for debugging to know a trap hasn't
> been
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Hi Peter!
>
> Thanks for the swift follow-up!
>
> At 2020-12-05T13:35:09-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > 1. Revert the change, possibly telling users in the manual how
> > > write their
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #57873 (project groff):
Subject: [PATCH] grog/subs.pl: Fix wrong regexp for groff options
groff/src/roff/grog/subs.pl: Fix wrong regular expressions for groff
options
The arguments to an option can contain other characters than
alphanumeric and '_', like '=' and '.'.
Hi Peter!
Thanks for the swift follow-up!
At 2020-12-05T13:35:09-0500, Peter Schaffter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 1. Revert the change, possibly telling users in the manual how
> > write their own validity-testing wrapper for .ch.
>
> What would such a
Update of bug #59573 (project groff):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 5 - Blocker
___
Follow-up Comment #4:
Setting as blocker because a decision needs to be taken before release.
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> [redirecting to groff@ for discussion]
>
> Background: In https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?59573, Bjarni
> pointed out that a recent change I made caused some diagnostics to
> appear.
> > troff:
Update of bug #59573 (project groff):
Status: Confirmed => Need Info
Assigned to:PTPi => gbranden
___
Follow-up Comment #3:
Mailing list
[redirecting to groff@ for discussion]
Background: In https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?59573, Bjarni
pointed out that a recent change I made caused some diagnostics to
appear.
> GROFFcontrib/mom/examples/typesetting.pdf
> troff: ../contrib/mom/examples/typesetting.mom:638: error:
Update of bug #55257 (project groff):
Status: In Progress => Fixed
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
Planned Release:None => 1.23.0
hello people,
i guess everything is in the title:
i really like the way ms render footnotes by default but the 2C layer
ease the reading of long texts on papers but renders footnotes per
columns. what i would like is to mix both and get this layer
10 matches
Mail list logo