Thanks to Robert, Nate, Tadziu, Oliver, and Dale for the replies--I
asked for help, and got it!
I'll cover the good news first.
Any system experiencing this problem can patch in a workaround (that I
have already committed to groff Git's master branch) that requires only
the editing of a text file
GNU groff version 1.23.0
I have some .png image.
I have converted it to the .eps file using convert img.png eps3:img.eps.
However, when I generate the pdf using groff -ms -Tpdf -Kutf8 tmp.ms > tmp.pdf,
the image is not inserted into the pdf.
There is only box with the image file path (which is co
On Saturday, 29 July 2023 13:28:39 BST Michał Kruszewski via wrote:
> GNU groff version 1.23.0
>
> I have some .png image.
> I have converted it to the .eps file using convert img.png eps3:img.eps.
> However, when I generate the pdf using groff -ms -Tpdf -Kutf8 tmp.ms >
> tmp.pdf, the image is not
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230729002703.lasps%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Chet Ramey wrote in
| <2fd2ed52-3272-3433-6179-164bc5122...@case.edu>:
| ...
||> At 2023-07-26T10:47:05+0200, Thomas ten Cate wrote:
||>> In the bash manual page (`man bash`), the ASCII tilde character '~'
||>> (0x7e) is
Chet Ramey wrote in
<2fd2ed52-3272-3433-6179-164bc5122...@case.edu>:
...
|> At 2023-07-26T10:47:05+0200, Thomas ten Cate wrote:
|>> In the bash manual page (`man bash`), the ASCII tilde character '~'
|>> (0x7e) is replaced by the Unicode character '˜' (U+02DC SMALL TILDE):
|>>
|>> $ ma
* On 2023 29 Jul 07:29 -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> Okay, so we see the bug on Debian 11 (bullseye), now termed
> "old-old-stable".
The unfortunate choice of three code names starting B strikes again!
old-old-stable should be Buster (Debian 10), old-stable should be
Bullseye (Debian 11) and
1.22.4, which I got via Cygwin, lacks -Tpdf, although the accompanying
man page describes it. Is it perhaps an installation option that
Cygwin didn't set?
Doug
On 7/28/23 3:28 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Hi Chet,
At 2023-07-28T15:15:48-0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
Applying the patch without any other changes to bash.1 results in
$ groff -Tascii -P -c -I/usr/local/src/bash/bash-20230728/doc -man
/usr/local/src/bash/bash-20230728/doc/bash.1 > bash.0
trof
Hi Doug,
At 2023-07-29T13:00:13-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> 1.22.4, which I got via Cygwin, lacks -Tpdf, although the accompanying
> man page describes it. Is it perhaps an installation option that
> Cygwin didn't set?
More or less. gropdf has some prerequisites, and if they aren't met,
grop
Hi Chet,
At 2023-07-29T13:16:55-0400, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 7/28/23 3:28 PM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Sorry about that. I fat-fingered it.
> >
> > An 'n' is needed after the second backslash, because we're interpolating
> > a register value.
>
> Thanks. I probably could have figured it o
Cygwin did exclude gropdf and pdfgroff. "The accompanying man page"
that I meant was groff.1. Perhaps that man page should say that not
all groff distributions support pdf.
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 1:35 PM G. Branden Robinson
wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> At 2023-07-29T13:00:13-0400, Douglas McIlroy wro
Hi Doug,
At 2023-07-29T15:16:42-0400, Douglas McIlroy wrote:
> Cygwin did exclude gropdf and pdfgroff. "The accompanying man page"
> that I meant was groff.1. Perhaps that man page should say that not
> all groff distributions support pdf.
Okay. I want to keep groff(1)'s comprehensive list of ma
Branden,
I forgot to add that your diagnosis seems to explain everything. I had
not noticed groff-perl among the zillion things on offer at Cygwin.
Being no fan of Perl, I may continue to rely on ps2pdf.
Doug
>
> Eh? That's precisely what it is. It covers matters that are (more or
> less) common to all roff implementations. Have you looked at it?
Sorry, my wires got crossed. I completely misread this discussion…
I'll see myself out.
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 at 09:42, G. Branden Robinson <
g.branden.
>
> I wonder why mandoc didn't just call its roff(7) page mandoc(7), given
> that it parallels groff(7) more than anything else.
>
Strictly speaking, Groff is at fault here; the manual page dedicated to the
Roff language proper should have been named as such, whereas groff(1)
pertains to an execut
At 2023-07-30T09:35:28+1000, John Gardner wrote:
[I wrote:]
> > I wonder why mandoc didn't just call its roff(7) page mandoc(7), given
> > that it parallels groff(7) more than anything else.
>
> Strictly speaking, Groff is at fault here; the manual page dedicated
> to the Roff language proper shou
Simply add
.if t .tr ~\(ti
to "tmac/an.tmac",
instead of changing (hard coding) it in the sources (man pages).
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 02:05:19AM +, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
> Simply add
>
> .if t .tr ~\(ti
>
> to "tmac/an.tmac",
> instead of changing (hard coding) it in the sources (man pages).
Correction:
Drop '.if t' as -Tutf8 is an nroff mode.
18 matches
Mail list logo