3. The Spanish inverted exclamation and question marks are
represented by the same characters in upright position.
While that will probably look strange to Spanish readers,
i can think of no better way, and i think everybody will
understand it. The current "i" and "c" is uni
On 9/08/2017 9:11 a.m., John Gardner wrote:
[too long]
You've e-mailed me directly, so the rest of the mailing list won't
hear you (assuming you haven't BCCed Mkkel in your reply). I've added
the list's address for you. =)
Do accept my apologies for the direct message. I hadn't my emai
till you actually try it, believe me I
have), has absolutely nothing to do with end user working
environments.
MS uses CP encodings for end-user interaction and that won't be
changing in the forseeable future, AFAIK. If you can point me to the
MSDN article that proves me wrong, I'll galdly
font family seems risky.
>
> Can you list more fonts?
>
May be these truetype embeded bitmap fonts can help?
http://sourceforge.jp/projects/mplus-fonts/.
--
Pedro A. López-Valencia
Better to remain silent and let people believe you are a fool than
open your mouth
which only had four hardwired
font positions, 0->R, 1->I, 2->B, 4->S for four different typeface
*tapes*. That is no longer the case, the C/A/Ts still in existence, if
there is any, are used as doorstops and Wang is long gone and buried.
Later ditroff versions inherite
On 2/21/06, Michail Vidiassov wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>> Michail Vidiassov wrote:
> >> BTW. I think the latter support was broken netertheless. Can you
> >> check?)
> >
> > I can't. I don't have an old troff running.
>
> What is the real state of the troff land?
On 2/21/06, Keith MARSHALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the complete absence of related of bug reports, either:
>
> 1) This isn't true (which seems unlikely), or (more likely)
>
> 2) No one has attempted to build groff >= 1.19.2, or to use pdfroff,
>on any system where /bin/sh is linked
On 2/25/06, Larry Kollar wrote:
>
> How much work would it be to hook into whatever system-wide printer
> drivers there may be?
A lot.
> This is something I've been pondering for a
> while, and I don't even have a clue how gtroff figures out glyph
> widths (is there some communication between gtr
On 3/13/06, Robert Marks wrote:
> Ted suggests adding the font to /font/devps/DESC (see below).
> What is the purpose of this?
> I haven't done it and things seem to work, but perhaps I'm missing something.
>
PS printers and software RIPs (namely, ghostscript as it is the best
know and more widesp
