Under what circumstances would a diversion that ends on the
bottom line of a page spring a footer trap even when the
diversion has been chopped?
As usual, please provide a small snippet which demonstrates
the problematic behaviour.
It might be related to outputting the diversion in
Under what circumstances would a diversion that ends on the bottom
line of a page spring a footer trap even when the diversion has been
chopped?
The end of document handling in groff is handled specially in the
C++ source; maybe there's a bug.
If anyone can come up with a reason (or several
I've been struggling with a problem for three days, so I guess
it's time to ask help.
Under what circumstances would a diversion that ends on the bottom
line of a page spring a footer trap even when the diversion has been
chopped?
I've been working on the refer section of mom, and I came upon
