Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-07 Thread Peter Schaffter
On Sunday 07 February 2010 01:46:42 am Werner LEMBERG wrote: Of course! I would be really glad if there are helping hands since my time is quite limited (and I'm a lazy person). Werner, if you're lazy, the rest of us might as well retire our shingles and sink back into the slough of entropy.

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I'm seeing these warnings in tables that *aren't* breaking the right margin as well as ones that are. Hmm. Perhaps the overshoot is very small, thus not visible to the eye? Perhaps I can add some user-controlled fuzziness (similar to TeX). If you don't think this is the cause please send me

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-05 Thread Denis M. Wilson
warning: around line 35: table wider than line width warning: around line 35: table squeezed horizontally to fit line length warning: around line 367: table wider than line width warning: around line 367: column separation set to zero I've included a patch to include the file name in the

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-05 Thread Larry Kollar
Werner LEMBERG wrote: I'm seeing these warnings in tables that *aren't* breaking the right margin as well as ones that are. Hmm. Perhaps the overshoot is very small, thus not visible to the eye? Perhaps I can add some user-controlled fuzziness (similar to TeX). If you don't think

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-05 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
I'm seeing these warnings in tables that *aren't* breaking the right margin as well as ones that are. Hmm. Perhaps the overshoot is very small, thus not visible to the eye? Perhaps I can add some user-controlled fuzziness (similar to TeX). If you don't think this is the cause

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-05 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Hmm. Perhaps the overshoot is very small, thus not visible to the eye? Perhaps I can add some user-controlled fuzziness (similar to TeX). If you don't think this is the cause please send me such an offending table for further inspection. That's pretty likely, the overshoot is not

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-05 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
I'm seeing these warnings in tables that *aren't* breaking the right margin as well as ones that are. Hmm. Perhaps the overshoot is very small, thus not visible to the eye? That's pretty likely, the overshoot is not easily noticed. There appear to be two different kinds of warnings: I

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-04 Thread Werner LEMBERG
I would support making tbl warnings optional, to be in line with troff, and other reasons, for example if a table is deliberately wider than the line width. Then you should increase the line width temporarily. Werner

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-04 Thread Larry Kollar
Werner LEMBERG wrote: I was thinking maybe a global option like nowarn -- the warnings are generally useful, but once a particular table has been debugged you wouldn't want to hear from it again. This should be quite easy to implement, and I would include it into groff if someone (you?) is

[Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-02 Thread Larry Kollar
I'm now seeing warnings like this when I runoff a manual containing tbl tables that use the expand global option: ./Installation.ms:3: warning: numeric expression expected (got `i') warning: around line 35: table wider than line width warning: around line 35: table squeezed horizontally to fit

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-02 Thread Denis M. Wilson
I would support making tbl warnings optional, to be in line with troff, and other reasons, for example if a table is deliberately wider than the line width. A new flag -w to enable warnings? Denis

Re: [Groff] New tbl warnings in CVS version

2010-02-02 Thread Larry Kollar
Denis M. Wilson wrote: I would support making tbl warnings optional, to be in line with troff, and other reasons, for example if a table is deliberately wider than the line width. A new flag -w to enable warnings? I was thinking maybe a global option like nowarn -- the warnings are