[Groff] Re: Bug in mm macro package

2006-02-18 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> file foo: > > .nr q 1 > .nr N 1 > .af q i > .ie (\n[q]=1)&(\n[N]=1) .tm Ho! > .el .tm boo > .fp 1 PR > .fp 2 PI > .fp 3 PB > .fp 4 PBI > .fp 5 CW > .fp 6 CI > .fp 7 CB > .fp 8 H > .fp 9 HB > .ds HF 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 > .BR bold roman > > groff -ww -mm foo > foo.ps > > bug.r:4: expected `;' after scale

Re: [Groff] Re: Bug in mm macro package

2006-02-18 Thread Clarke Echols
When I used AT&T troff at HP about 15-20 years ago, there was no ".fam" request available, and \fR *always* went to "Times Roman". The advantage of using \f1 through \f4 in text and the .fp request was that one could rearrange the typography of a 3000 page manual by changing the font selected by e

Re: [Groff] Re: Bug in mm macro package

2006-02-19 Thread Pedro A. López-Valencia
On 2/18/06, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > > This is not correct. The example DESC file for a PostScript printer > given in the Troff User's Manual (CSTR 54), section 23, is as follows. > > position 1 = R > position 2 = I > position 3 = B > position 4 = BI > ... >

Re: [Groff] Re: Bug in mm macro package

2006-02-19 Thread Clarke Echols
Werner LEMBERG wrote: I used New Century Schoolbook for fonts 1, 2, and 3, and Courier for font 4. They were specified by four lines in the manpage macros I was using that I had modified from the AT&T to suit my own purposes. This is still possible. I assume the .fam request came along when

Re: [Groff] Re: Bug in mm macro package

2006-02-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I used New Century Schoolbook for fonts 1, 2, and 3, and Courier for > font 4. They were specified by four lines in the manpage macros I > was using that I had modified from the AT&T to suit my own purposes. This is still possible. > I assume the .fam request came along when groff was invented

Re: [Groff] Re: Bug in mm macro package

2006-02-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > I don't see how this is related to the concept of accessing a font > > position directly. \f[B] does the same, doesn't it? > > It does now, but in 1989-1993 there was no .fam request, and it was > much easier to use .fp instead of \f(NB or some such thing in a > macro file, having to change i