At 2017-12-03T09:06:52-0500, Mike Bianchi wrote:
> > I also find it funny if I ever need to talk about money in dollars: a
> > dollar sign ($) is obviously needed. Tried escaping the $ like `\$', but
> > that ..obviously.. didn't work.
>
> But it seemed ..so.. close, so I tried this:
> .cha
> I also find it funny if I ever need to talk about money in dollars: a
> dollar sign ($) is obviously needed. Tried escaping the $ like `\$', but
> that ..obviously.. didn't work.
But it seemed ..so.. close, so I tried this:
.char \[$] "$
Dollar \[$]
The special character \[$] i
That seems very reasonable an explanation. Thank you. :)
I didn't know that the problem had something to do with EQN's inline
equation. It wasn't so obvious, but it makes sense nonetheless.
I also find it funny if I ever need to talk about money in dollars: a
dollar sign ($) is obviously needed
Hi Stephanie,
> using the eqn "delim" request with dollars seems to start an inline
> equation for ".de $c"!
Yes, Steffen's right. The `$' in `$c' is looking to the preprocessor
eqn as part of the inline equation delimeters set beforehand with `delim
$$'. Moving the `.de $c' definition to befor
Hey.
Stephanie Björk wrote:
|For quite a bit, I've been trying to redefine the .$c macro for the -me
|macros. According to the reference manual, the macro package allows the
|user to redefine how chapters look when they get printed, by redefining
|that macro.
|
|Here's my redefinition. In
For quite a bit, I've been trying to redefine the .$c macro for the -me
macros. According to the reference manual, the macro package allows the
user to redefine how chapters look when they get printed, by redefining
that macro.
Here's my redefinition. In the original file, I added no comments, b
