Re: 1.23.0rc4 .sp and .bp backward compatibility issues

2023-04-17 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Deri, At 2023-04-17T18:50:11+0100, Deri wrote: > > I have a fix for the `bp` request on a Git branch.[1] I cannot say > > at this point whether it will get into groff 1.23.0 final--it's not > > solely my call. > > [...] > I have noticed our own documentation appears to have suffered a

Re: 1.23.0rc4 .sp and .bp backward compatibility issues

2023-04-17 Thread Deri
On Monday, 17 April 2023 10:40:15 BST G. Branden Robinson wrote: > Hi Michał, > > At 2023-04-17T09:02:15+, Michał Kruszewski via wrote: > > Hi Branden, > > > > I have tried 1.23.0rc4 and it still has backward compatibility issues > > with .sp and .bp I have described some time ago. > > > >

Re: 1.23.0rc4 .sp and .bp backward compatibility issues

2023-04-17 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Michał, At 2023-04-17T09:02:15+, Michał Kruszewski via wrote: > Hi Branden, > > I have tried 1.23.0rc4 and it still has backward compatibility issues > with .sp and .bp I have described some time ago. > > Is it intended? Semi-intended. After a certain date in March, our maintainer

1.23.0rc4 .sp and .bp backward compatibility issues

2023-04-17 Thread Michał Kruszewski via
Hi Branden, I have tried 1.23.0rc4 and it still has backward compatibility issues with .sp and .bp I have described some time ago. Is it intended? Best regards, Michał Kruszewski Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.