Radical reforms to line-numbered tables (was: Unexpected behaviour when using linenumbering and tbl)

2022-11-28 Thread G. Branden Robinson
I have an update on this. At 2022-11-25T02:33:57-0600, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2022-11-24T19:47:35+0100, hbezemer--- via wrote: > > When I make exams I sometimes use linenumbering so I can refer to a > > specific line of a source. I noticed some unexpected behaviour when > > having a

Re: Unexpected behaviour when using linenumbering and tbl

2022-11-26 Thread hbezemer--- via
"G. Branden Robinson" wrote: Hi Tadziu and Branden, Thanks for the quickfix Tadziu. I've noted for myself to check the output of any preprocessor when trying to understand certain behaviour. Branden thanks for sketching out the broader issue. Being just an enduser, it's hard for me to give any

Re: Unexpected behaviour when using linenumbering and tbl

2022-11-25 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Hans, At 2022-11-24T19:47:35+0100, hbezemer--- via wrote: > When I make exams I sometimes use linenumbering so I can refer to a > specific line of a source. I noticed some unexpected behaviour when > having a table after the part that has linenumbers. The table also > gets linenumbers added,

Re: Unexpected behaviour when using linenumbering and tbl

2022-11-24 Thread Tadziu Hoffmann
> What can be done to resolve this issue? One possible way would be to put .nr ln 0 after ".nm". Explanation: if you look at the output of tbl, you can see that tbl will issue ".nm" requests under certain circumstances, but apparently only if the line number register is nonzero.

Unexpected behaviour when using linenumbering and tbl

2022-11-24 Thread hbezemer--- via
Dear All, When I make exams I sometimes use linenumbering so I can refer to a specific line of a source. I noticed some unexpected behaviour when having a table after the part that has linenumbers. The table also gets linenumbers added, which should not be the case of course. I can reproduce