Re: mdoc(7) prologue regressions

2022-07-31 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Branden, G. Branden Robinson wrote on Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 02:21:49AM -0500: > At 2022-06-27T00:29:08+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: >> The first issue i identified is a group of regressions in the >> behaviour of the mdoc(7) prologue macros .Dt and .Os. >> The regressions aren't particularly seve

Re: mdoc(7) prologue regressions

2022-07-16 Thread G. Branden Robinson
[self-follow-up] At 2022-07-16T02:21:49-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > groff man(7) in groff Git behaves pretty badly if `TH` is omitted, > whereas groff 1.22.4 degrades much more gracefully. I was incorrect about this. I was comparing 1.22.4's "groff -mandoc" to Git HEAD's "groff -ww -man".

Re: mdoc(7) prologue regressions

2022-07-16 Thread G. Branden Robinson
Hi Ingo, At 2022-06-27T00:29:08+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > The first issue i identified is a group of regressions in the > behaviour of the mdoc(7) prologue macros .Dt and .Os. > The regressions aren't particularly severe because all that i found > so far only trigger when the document uses thes

mdoc(7) prologue regressions

2022-06-26 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi, after getting the build system issues mostly out of the way, i proceeded to run-time testing of groff-current. The first issue i identified is a group of regressions in the behaviour of the mdoc(7) prologue macros .Dt and .Os. The regressions aren't particularly severe because all that i foun