memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x (was: stpecpy(): A better string copy function)

Hi Branden, On 2/13/22 19:29, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: >> Oh, I was going to ask if you were aware of stpcpy(), but if I click the >> link to codidact I see that you are. >> >> I expect/hope stpcpy to become the new norm for string copying, though >> it will require overcoming much ine

Re: memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x (was: stpecpy(): A better string copy function)

On 2/13/22 13:32, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: Hi Branden, On 2/13/22 19:29, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: Oh, I was going to ask if you were aware of stpcpy(), but if I click the link to codidact I see that you are. I expect/hope stpcpy to become the new norm for string copying

Re: memccpy(3) and stpcpy(3) status in C2x (was: stpecpy(): A better string copy function)

Martin Sebor wrote in : |On 2/13/22 13:32, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: |> On 2/13/22 19:29, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: .. |>>> I expect/hope stpcpy to become the new norm for string copying, though |>>> it will require overcoming much inertia and many dusty old books. |>>>