Re: [gmx-users] Question for bdc = xy

2014-03-21 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/21/14, 4:43 PM, ookami a wrote: Hi, I just checked previous posts, they said increasing the size of z-direction to create a vaccum layer would be working. So I extend my z-direction with 3 times of the original box, when I run the pvt process, the vacuum layer disappeared. As you should

Re: [gmx-users] Question for bdc = xy

2014-03-21 Thread ookami a
Hi, I just checked previous posts, they said increasing the size of z-direction to create a vaccum layer would be working. So I extend my z-direction with 3 times of the original box, when I run the pvt process, the vacuum layer disappeared. How could I modified my nvt.mdp file? From the pre posts,

Re: [gmx-users] Double parameters

2014-03-21 Thread Josip Lovrić
Thank you, my system is not water, protein and ions. I have just mention them for example. My system is palmitic acid on NaCl surface, with water around. Problem is that I want use different set of palmitic acid charges actually for interaction between palmitic acid-NaCl and palmitic acid-water. I

Re: [gmx-users] Double parameters

2014-03-21 Thread Mark Abraham
No. Your protein parameters will be common to both, and your water-ion interactions are defined implicitly by whatever you'd choose for their interactions with protein. Moreover, you'd have no reason to suppose the combination would work. See http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Force_F

[gmx-users] Double parameters

2014-03-21 Thread Josip Lovrić
Hello dear gromacs users, lets say that we have 3 kinds of molecules in our system, for example water, protein and some ions. Is it possible to have one set Force field parameters of protein for protein-water and other for protein-ions interaction. Best Regards, Josip Lovrić -- Gromacs Users ma

Re: [gmx-users] Question for bdc = xy

2014-03-21 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/20/14, 11:51 PM, ookami a wrote: Dear all: I'm trying to set up a bdc only with xy, so I edited my mdp file with changing the bdc =xyz to bdc = xy. However, I got a error message which is "Can not have Ewald with pbc=xy" Anyone know how to solve it? Per the manual, you can't use an Ewa

[gmx-users] Question for bdc = xy

2014-03-21 Thread ookami a
Dear all: I'm trying to set up a bdc only with xy, so I edited my mdp file with changing the bdc =xyz to bdc = xy. However, I got a error message which is "Can not have Ewald with pbc=xy" Anyone know how to solve it? Thank you! -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http:

Re: [gmx-users] User-defined potentials and meaning of table extension

2014-03-21 Thread Mark Abraham
With the group scheme, rlist constructs a neighbour list that is updated every nstlist steps. The relative size of rlist and (say) rcoulomb determines what that means, e.g. for having a buffer. If there is no potential modifier, then rcoulomb is not used in the kernel, so particles can diffuse past

Re: [gmx-users] User-defined potentials and meaning of table extension

2014-03-21 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/21/14, 5:22 AM, Davide Mercadante wrote: Hello GMX users, I am testing the use of User-defined on a box of water and I came across the issue of table-extension option. I don't understand the use of it. If I specify a cutoff of 1 nm and then give a table extension of 0 nm then the cutoff

[gmx-users] User-defined potentials and meaning of table extension

2014-03-21 Thread Davide Mercadante
Hello GMX users, I am testing the use of User-defined on a box of water and I came across the issue of table-extension option. I don't understand the use of it. If I specify a cutoff of 1 nm and then give a table extension of 0 nm then the cutoff will be 1 nm otherwise it will be cutoff+table-ext

Re: [gmx-users] Error: illegal instruction (core dumped)

2014-03-21 Thread Mark Abraham
On Mar 21, 2014 8:52 AM, "Ly Minh Nhat" wrote: > > http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Guidance-on-how-to-install-Gromacs-5-0-beta2-td5014681.html > Hi all, > > When I was following the protein - ligand complex tutorial > (link< http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin/gmx-tutorials/

Re: [gmx-users] Question about topology construction.

2014-03-21 Thread Mark Abraham
No, but you can represent the molecule as truly linear using a virtual site to construct the position of the carbon from the oxygens. See past discussions on this list. Mark On Mar 21, 2014 8:40 AM, "sujith ks" wrote: > Hello Justin, > > Thanks for the response. In the EMP2 model the bond angl

Re: [gmx-users] Parameterisation of transition metal ions in gromacs

2014-03-21 Thread Mark Abraham
Please see http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Parameterization On Mar 21, 2014 8:04 AM, "sukriti002" wrote: > > Hi, > > I have to do simulations in GROMACS with Vanadium ions (V+3,V+2,VO2+) but > non bonded parameters for vanadium are not present in gromos forcefield. > Can > anyone ple

Re: [gmx-users] Guidance on how to install Gromacs-5.0-beta2

2014-03-21 Thread ooker
Hi Pavan Kumar,Can you help me show the specific path to fftw? Thank you -- View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Guidance-on-how-to-install-Gromacs-5-0-beta2-tp5014681p5015294.html Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Gromacs Users m

Re: [gmx-users] Multi-GPU calculation

2014-03-21 Thread Mark Abraham
On Mar 21, 2014 6:46 AM, "arrow50311" wrote: > > Hi, > > If I put in -gpu_id 0011, will it be the case that the gpu #0 from node 1 be > assigned to both rank 0 and rank 2? -gpu_id applies *per-node*, so 0011 is useful only with four ranks *per node*. Your original question wanted four ranks for

[gmx-users] Error: illegal instruction (core dumped)

2014-03-21 Thread Ly Minh Nhat
http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Guidance-on-how-to-install-Gromacs-5-0-beta2-td5014681.html Hi all, When I was following the protein - ligand complex tutorial (link), I met an error while running pdb2

Re: [gmx-users] Question about topology construction.

2014-03-21 Thread sujith ks
Hello Justin, Thanks for the response. In the EMP2 model the bond angle potential is of the harmonic form with the equilibrium angle 180. The only way I could include this in the .itp was though [angles]. The other two options [angle_restraints] and [angle_restraints_z] has a different form for

[gmx-users] Parameterisation of transition metal ions in gromacs

2014-03-21 Thread sukriti002
Hi, I have to do simulations in GROMACS with Vanadium ions (V+3,V+2,VO2+) but non bonded parameters for vanadium are not present in gromos forcefield. Can anyone please let me know how can I find parameters for vanadium or if anyone has found these parameters in literature? Also I tried to find