Hi,
Though it's not Gromacs related, it seems like you put two set of data into
one (e.g. joining two sets of RMSf in one file). If this is the case put
them in two files or in two columns of the same file and using -nxy option
(assuming you're using Grace). Anyway, consulting manual of your plot
Dear Users,
I am energy minimising a quite large solvated system containing protein and
lipids (~800,000 atoms). I used to fix components of the system in order to
speed-up energy minimisation and sometimes it is easier to debug such
processes. Here is my protocol:
1. fix all except water and so t
Yes, I just wanted to try the script, to figure out what's hapenning.. I
tried both N4 and O11.
Sure.I'll do that.
Thank you in advance
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/25/15 6:12 PM, Mahboobe Sadr wrote:
>
>> I used spc water and the command was :
>>
>> perl
On 6/25/15 6:21 PM, S.M. Golam Mortuza wrote:
Hi Justin,
Thanks a lot for your reply and suggestion. I have pulled the master branch and performed
"git checkout drude". I think, the file named md.cpp in /src/program/mdrun is
the main file to run the code. Please let me know if I am wrong.
T
On 6/25/15 6:12 PM, Mahboobe Sadr wrote:
I used spc water and the command was :
perl water_deletor.pl -in bilayer.gro -out bilayer_fix.gro -ref N4
-middle C50 -water 3 -v yes
Using N4 as a reference is a bad idea; you don't want to desolvate the
headgroups. This will lead to unstable si
On 6/25/15 2:46 PM, John Degenstein wrote:
Justin,
Ok, so I decided to take a different path to solve this issue. Essentially,
using the Berendsen Pcoupl the system should condense under high pressure.
For some reason it does not seem to work very quickly at least. To get
around this issue I r
On 6/25/15 3:43 AM, Timofey Tyugashev wrote:
Looking through the paper for the FF I see that the values specified are 1.0 nm
and 1.05 nm for cutoffs. If I used longer cutoffs than specified, then why it
should affect the systme in a deleterious way?
Force fields behave unexpectedly when you
Hi Justin,
Thanks a lot for your reply and suggestion. I have pulled the master branch and
performed "git checkout drude". I think, the file named md.cpp in
/src/program/mdrun is the main file to run the code. Please let me know if I am
wrong.
I am just wondering how can I execute the code in my
I used spc water and the command was :
perl water_deletor.pl -in bilayer.gro -out bilayer_fix.gro -ref N4
-middle C50 -water 3 -v yes
Regards
M.Sadr
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/24/15 8:53 AM, Mahboobe Sadr wrote:
>
>> I tried this script with ref atom O1
Justin,
Ok, so I decided to take a different path to solve this issue. Essentially,
using the Berendsen Pcoupl the system should condense under high pressure.
For some reason it does not seem to work very quickly at least. To get
around this issue I running several steps of equilibration EM follow
OK, that suggests the file itself is fine. 5000fs per frame times 4000
frames is suspiciously close to 2^31... might there be a 32-bit limitation
going on here? Otherwise, use trjconv to chop up your trajectory and get
access to it that way.
Mark
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:01 PM Vidyalakshmi CM
w
Dear Sir,
I used the gromacs gmxcheck command and I got the following output display:
Item#frames Timestep (ps)
Step 48405
Time 48405
Lambda 0
Coords48405
Velocities 0
Forces 0
Box 48405
Therefore the total num
Hi,
You can use gmxcheck / gmx check to examine the file and perhaps get some
more information, but this sounds like something has mis-managed your file.
e.g. you didn't construct it how you think you did, or the (parallel) file
system upon which you ran mdrun is not reliable.
Mark
On Thu, Jun 2
Thanks very much. Ok I will check again, it seems that they are at the same
step!
only the thing that comes to my mind is that I used different number of
cpus when I tried to update few steps for some replicas, and then I used
the primary numbers of cpu that I used.
Also I got this error when I up
Dear Mark,
When I tried with new update of the state.cpt files, I got this error.
Abort(1) on node 896 (rank 896 in comm 1140850688): Fatal error in
MPI_Allreduce: Message truncated, error stack:
MPI_Allreduce(912)...: MPI_Allreduce(sbuf=MPI_IN_PLACE,
rbuf=0x7ffc783af760, count=4, MPI_DOUBLE,
Hi,
I can't tell either. Please run gmxcheck on all your input files, to check
the simulation part, time and step number are all what you think they are
(and that they match across the simulations) and try again.
Mark
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:12 PM leila salimi wrote:
> Dear Mark,
>
> When I
hello every one,
Actually i want to calculate Displacements of the components of the
proteinn residue wise for the first eigenvector in gromacs. is thre is any
option already present in gromacs for such calculation.
thanks in advance--
--
*Rajan kumar choudhary*
*Senior Research Fellow*
*Depa
hello every one,
Actually i want to calculate Displacements of the components of the
proteinn residue wise for the first eigenvector in gromacs. is thre is any
option already present in gromacs for such calculation.
thanks in advance--
*Rajan kumar choudhary*
*Senior Research Fellow*
*Departm
Dear All,
I am trying to visualize the gromacs output .xtc trajectory on VMD. I am
generating .xtc trajectory frames every 5 ps. The total simulation run time
is 24195 ps which should give me 4839 frames (without any skip). However,
when I load frames say 4000 to 4100, I get the error message 'Err
Dear Mark:
Thank you very much for your reply, now the problem has been solved. I write
all configurations into a .xtc file and generate a .tpr with the first
configurature, then carry out the rerun job, that's the solution. Thank you
again!
Sincerely!
--
Zidan Zhang
Ph.D. Candidate
Departmen
I used spc water and the command was :
perl water_deletor.pl -in bilayer.gro -out bilayer_fix.gro -ref N4
-middle C50 -water 3 -v yes
Regards
M.Sadr
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 6/24/15 8:53 AM, Mahboobe Sadr wrote:
>
>> I tried this script with ref atom O1
Hi all,
I have been running a dimer in simulation in GROMACS opls/aa, after that I am
getting a joining line in the rms fluctuation.
anyone please help me for that. chains are separated by A and B nomenclature
Please find the plot in the following link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7TB1kZS
Hello
I was looking for GROMACS benchmarks and I saw the new 5.0 benchmark results at:
http://www.gromacs.org/@api/deki/files/240/=gromacs-5.0-benchmarks.pdf
>From a quick read there aren't many details about the benchmarks
themselves. Are the scripts and data used for these runs publicly
availa
Just to make sure I want to recheck myself:
Lennard-Jones interactions cutoffs (set at 10A in the paper) are defined
by rvdw
short-range electrostatic interactions (set at 10A in the paper two) are
defined by rlist and rcoulomb, but when I use Verlet scheme, rlist is
ignored anyway.
long-range
Ok thanks! I will analyze this more deeply and maybe also try differen
geometries. And sorry for the stupid question, I was reading force but was
thinking potential instead...
Laura
-Original Message-
From: "Justin Lemkul"
Sent: 25/06/2015 02:23
To: "gmx-us...@gromacs.org"
Subject:
Dear Mark:
> I think you will need to use a 64 bit mingw with GROMACS 5 and up.
Thank you for the comments.
I'd tried MinGW-64 (acturally TDM-GCC-64) and succeeded to build
64bit gromacs-5.0.5 on a windows PC.
However, I need 32bit gromacs-5.0.5 binary for 32bit windows PCs.
Then, I'd tried "-m32
Looking through the paper for the FF I see that the values specified are
1.0 nm and 1.05 nm for cutoffs. If I used longer cutoffs than specified,
then why it should affect the systme in a deleterious way?
Anyway, now I'll try simulations with values from the paper, both for
oxoguanine and plai
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:23 AM 张紫丹 wrote:
> Dear GROMACS users:
> Is it possible to use template.c to calculate single point energy?
No.
> I know template.c can analyze the trajectory information. Now I want to
> calculate a specific system, which contains several configurations
> gener
Hi all
I am running some free energy tutorial calculations to learn more about how
those are set up in gromacs, but have run into a problem when using
different versions.
I am following the free energy tutorial on the Gromacs website
(fe-tutorial-4.6), so not Justin's tutorial.
With vmx 4.6.5 ev
29 matches
Mail list logo