respected sir
5.0.7
43A1p
my TPO is removed in simulation while sep is remain attached with residue ???
kindly privide me any guide line
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read
Dear Gromacs users,
I am trying to calculate distance between two specific residues of active site
of my protein in MD. I have made separate .index file of two specific groups.
Then I am trying this command
" gmx distance -f md_0_1.xtc -s md_0_1.tpr -oav distance.xvg -select -n
index.ndx -tu n
respected sir!
version 5.0.7
43A1p
respected sir kindly provide me guide line about TPO
my TPO is breakdown when i generated PDB of my protein while SEP and PTR is
remain attached i am surprised what happens with TPO ???
kindly provide me any idea what happens TPO?? why its breakdown ???
thank
Dear all gromacs users and developers
I make my own code based on definition introduced on paper of Luzar, Chandler
and Van der Spoel and compute correlation function so that It can have initial
value of 1 and approach to 0 as time goes on. I plot computed correlation
function together with co
Hello, i ḿ working in a lipid bilayer using charmm36 forcefield and trying to
do NVT equilibration but when i use grompp for nvt i receive the folowing
error: The cut-off length is longer than half the shortest box vector or
longer than the smallest box diagonal element. Increase the box size o
Hi
It is a small ligand decoupling from its native protein and there are
orientational restraints near high decoupled region.
I am using gcc and gfortran compilers .
Jagannath
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Szilárd Páll
wrote:
> No, the free energy kernels run on the CPU. This large change m
assuming that below command produce what I am looking for
-bash-4.1$ tail -n 3 eq_npt.log
(Mnbf/s) (GFlops) (ns/day) (hour/ns)
Performance: 1978.319102.192 21.487 1.117
Finished mdrun on node 0 Tue Mar 15 16:23:03 2016
what combination of the shell commands wil
Right, thanks so much!
2016-03-15 13:58 GMT+01:00 Mark Abraham :
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:57 AM James Starlight
> wrote:
>
>> just performed some benchmarks with full atomic system- short md of
>> the water soluble protein still using mpiexec -np 46 mdrun_openmpi of
>> the GMX 4.5 a
No, the free energy kernels run on the CPU. This large change must mean
that you have a relatively large fraction of the system participating in
perturbed interactions.
What compiler are you using? The free energy kernel is a bit "sensitive"
(to put it mildly) and I do remember seeing much better
Dear Gromacs users
I am trying to perform Free energy peturbation calculation in presence of
distance, angle and dihedral-restraint for a protein-ligand system.
However, I am finding, on turning on the FEP calculation, the performance
of gromacs5.1.1. in a gpu-based workstation significantly gets
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:57 AM James Starlight
wrote:
> just performed some benchmarks with full atomic system- short md of
> the water soluble protein still using mpiexec -np 46 mdrun_openmpi of
> the GMX 4.5 and there were no such errors with DD so it seems that the
> problem indeed in
Hi,
Yes, that's a typo. I have fixed it for future versions.
Mark
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:49 AM Parvez Mh wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> In manual-5.06, page:82,
>
>
> [image: Inline image 1]
> Shouldn't the last term be C4(1-cos(4Phi)) ?
>
> --Masrul
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please s
Hi,
a short question regarding the mdp option "QMmethod" when using ORCA for QM/MM simulations. If I understand the source code (gromacs/mdlib/qm_orca.cpp) of the ORCA interface correctly, it looks like GROMACS is not telling ORCA what QMmethod to use.
Does the QMmethod mdp-option change anyt
just performed some benchmarks with full atomic system- short md of
the water soluble protein still using mpiexec -np 46 mdrun_openmpi of
the GMX 4.5 and there were no such errors with DD so it seems that the
problem indeed in MARTINI atoms representation.
BTW how I could quickly check some info a
Hi again,
I had a look at your post at ResearchGate, where you ask the same question and
provide both source code and output from your. Two things differ between
gromacs’ calculation and yours. First of all, gromacs normalises the
correlation function so that it is 1 at t=0. This is common prac
Dear Agnivo,
No. g_hbond / gmx bond takes pbc into account, so you normally don’t need to
bother with preprocessing your trajectory.
Kind regards,
Erik
> On 15 Mar 2016, at 01:09, Agnivo Gosai wrote:
>
> Dear Users,
>
> I always do pbc correction for the trajectory before doing RMSD, Radius
Dear all gromacs users,
I am trying to run simulation for my Phophorylated threonin
(TPO at 172 position in A chain og 4CFF
pdb id), I have generate topology using Prodrg2server. Then i try to run
energy minimization step its showing following error--
1.
17 matches
Mail list logo