Hello,
I am having problems during creating the indexes for atoms which have same
atom labelling for the two/three different molecules in the system (say
nitrogen atom that is labelled as N in both the molecules).
whn i gave the command:-
gmx make_ndx -f md.gro -o a.ndx
i am getting the prompt as
Dear Justin and gmx users,
I have gone through mdp-option and Justin A. Lemkul's COM pulling tutorial
serveral times.
The following is Justin's pull code.
; Pull code
pull= yes
pull_ngroups= 2
pull_ncoords= 1
pull_group1_name= Chain_B
pull
Dear gmx-users
I have a problem in equilibration my protein-ligand complex and encountered to
this error after 2 steps of 5 steps:one or more water molecules can not be
settled. check for bad contacts or reduce the time steps.
so I decided to create a topology for my designed drug (50 atoms)
Hi,
I am working on a node with Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz, 16
physical core, 32 logical core and 1 GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti.
I am launching a series of 2 ns molecolar dynamics simulations of a system
of 6 atoms.
I tried diverse setting combination, but however i obtained t
Dear Justin,
Thank you for the answer. I changed the two parameters suggested in the mdp
file and I ran again a minimization, 200 ps NVT, 200 ps NPT, and 1 ns MD for
the two cases of the previous mail, and now I am getting densities around 771
g/m3 which is slightly underestimated, but close t
Hi,
The output files from acpype I mean.
Mark
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:59 PM Khadija Amine wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your quick reply.
>
> You mean by 'the acpype files must be edited to have all the atom types in
> a block before any of the molecules' all the files with GMX as I ha
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your quick reply.
You mean by 'the acpype files must be edited to have all the atom types in
a block before any of the molecules' all the files with GMX as I have used
amberff99sb.
There are many files for charmm, opls, ...
In my case, I should see the following files: AC
BS”D
I am trying to simulate a multichain amino acid structure. PDB ID 2BEG.
I am experiencing problems with the C and N terminal residues i. e. C-ALA
and N-LEU.
An abnormal non-bonded interaction keeps forming between atoms C from ALA42
and N from LEU17.
Do you mean from Ala42 of Chain A to
Hello Aman,
this probably means that your system is not well equilibrated. You can
try a smaller time step. But I would also recommend to google the error
and you will find a lot of qualified suggestions.
All the best
Johannes
On 10.07.2017 14:33, Aman Deep wrote:
hello,
I was trying to
hello,
I was trying to simulate a protein of 1200 residues, during NVT run I got
error repeatedly that is:
*step 11: Water molecule starting at atom 115665 can not be settled.*
*Check for bad contacts and/or reduce the timestep if appropriate.*
please tell me what is reason for it and how to sol
Hi,
Checkpoints continue unfinished calculations. Energy minimization generally
is short, and only stops when complete, so there is no meaningful restart.
Mark
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:13 Yonatan Zelnik wrote:
> Hello Justin,
>
> I see now why there aren't checkpoint files being produced. I gues
Hi,
The rdf should be constructed from specially constructed index groups, eg
from all N in a specified molecule. Don't try to involve pdb2gmx, it needs
to match the names to the rtp files.
Mark
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:06 Dilip H N wrote:
> Hello,
> 1] I want to simulate A and B mixtures...but
Hi,
The atomtypes directive must appear early. So the acpype files must be
edited to have all the atom types in a block before any of the
moleculetypes. This is covered specifically at
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors#Invalid_order_for_directive_xxx
Mark
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 13:35 K
Hello,
I have read the documentation and tried to solve the problem but still
having the same error.
Any suggestions, please?
*Khadija Amine*
Ph.D. Biology and Health
Biochemistry & Bioinformatics
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mai
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors#Invalid_order_for_directive_xxx
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscri
Dear gromacs users,
I have a protein with two bound ligands, GNP and ACT.
For the protein I have prepared topology with amber ff96. pdb2gmx
created three itp files for the two protein chains and one for CA and
MG ions.
Fore GNP and ACY I have generated itp files perfectly using acpype
.When I
x2top does indeed do that with graphene and CNTs. Strictly speaking, the
remaining 3/4 of the dihedrals are not redundant, so ideally you should
test the mechanical properties of your CNT. If the constant for the
dihedral energy term came from a model, which counts all four dihedrals,
I would a
Hi,
You can create a separate index file and feed that for your calculations.
--
Regards,
Nikhil Maroli
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/M
Hello,
1] I want to simulate A and B mixtures...but the problem is tht in both the
say atoms of nitrogen's of both A and B molecules are labelled as N
onlywhich during the indexing for RDF creates problems...
So in the CHARMM FF .rtp file, i changed the nitrogen (of B molecule) N
into N1 and t
Dear GROMACS users,
I have used the x2top to generate a topology file for the zig-zag carbon
nanotube (6,0). The pbc were applied. I noticed that the number of generated
dihedral angles is just a quarter of the total number of the dihedral angles in
the CNT. Actually, there are four dihedrals a
20 matches
Mail list logo