[gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread ‪farial tavakoli‬ ‪
Dear GROMACS users I need to run a MD on my Protein-peptide ligand complex in GROMACS. I generated my ligand topology by gromose96 54a7 ff ( [moleculetypes] was Protein_chain_B) and converted it to .itp file to string it in Protein.top file, then, added Protein_chain_B in [ molecules ] directive

Re: [gmx-users] lower-end GPUs

2017-10-03 Thread Szilárd Páll
Hi, I think the 1070s and 1080s are the best value for money. These days, given that it's I think it costs ~20% more, the 1080 is probably a bit better value for money, but it's going to be a bit above $500, I think. Also note that we're working on new GPU acceleration-related features that will

Re: [gmx-users] grompp very slow generating .tpr when excluded bonded neighbours is large

2017-10-03 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/2/17 11:14 PM, Dallas Warren wrote: Thanks for the reply Justin. I am just going to use the largest exclusion bond distance I can, then ignore the RDF of those beyond that distance. Seems curious to me (not actually understanding what grommp is generating) that the list is so large. Th

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/3/17 4:26 AM, ‪farial tavakoli‬ ‪ wrote: Dear GROMACS users I need to run a MD on my Protein-peptide ligand complex in GROMACS. I generated my ligand topology by gromose96 54a7 ff ( [moleculetypes] was Protein_chain_B) and converted it to .itp file to string it in Protein.top file, then

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/3/17 9:17 AM, ‪farial tavakoli‬ ‪ wrote: Dear Justin Thank you so much for your reply. You mean , I should generate a topology file for my complex instead of creating topology for each of them separately ? As long as the protein and peptide ligand are denoted as being in separate c

[gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Hi, I was wondering what the best approach is to simulate a negatively charged topology imported from ANTECHAMBER (which can't do integral charges): 1. Do QM calculations on the molecule, then edit the output from Antechamber or 2. Do something else. Sergio Manzetti [ http://www.fjordfor

Re: [gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread João Henriques
Hi! If your goal is to generate the atomic partial charges for a new residue/molecule (not existing in the FF you are interested in using), then doing the QM calculations is a must in most cases. For example, AMBER FFs have a well documented and specific recipe you can easily follow, which involve

Re: [gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Thanks Joao, I am on the way with the QM part, but making the topology for GMX is a little bit more complicated. I thought of generating one with ANTECHAMBER Of a neutral species, then edit the topology itp file manually, but the propers are quite complex to re-edit. How did you get around thi

Re: [gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread João Henriques
I just left work and I'm terrible with typing on the phone, so please bear with me. Since I mostly work with proteins and modified residues it was always worth it for me to edit the actual FF instead of making an itp by hand. This way I let pdb2gmx do the tedious work of building the topology for

Re: [gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Thanks, in which file do you add your residue, do you have an example? Thanks! Sergio Manzetti [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/logo_hr2.jpg ] [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ | Fjordforsk AS ] [ http://www.fjordforsk.no/ | ] Midtun 6894 Vangsnes Norge Org.nr. 911 659 654 Tlf: +47 57695621 [ h

Re: [gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread João Henriques
This can potetially involve minimal editting or a lot of work. If you will be using atom types already in place, you mainly need to edit the rtp file. The charges, bonds and impropers go there. Other files need minimal work like the residuetypes.dat and possibly the hdb, r2b, etc. Avoid touching t

[gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread ABEL Stephane
HI It is quite easy to derive RESP charges and use them with GROMACS. You could follow the steps 1) Build a pdb file of your molecule/modified residue 2) Use the web server pyRED (http://upjv.q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDServer-Development/) and derive the RESP charges. The webserver will al

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread farial tavakoli
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Thanks alot for your advxe I would really appreciate if you advice me more to split protein and ligand in index file, I saw the

Re: [gmx-users] grompp very slow generating .tpr when excluded bonded neighbours is large

2017-10-03 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, I'm sure we have opportunities to improve this code - please do file a redmine issue with repro inputs so we can profile and see! Thanks, Mark On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 3:05 PM Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 10/2/17 11:14 PM, Dallas Warren wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Justin. > > > > I am

Re: [gmx-users] Charges and Antechamber

2017-10-03 Thread João Henriques
Or this... :) I've never used it, but I'm sure it works like a charm. I personally prefer to be more involved in all stages of the process, but I'm a bit old school and I like to avoid "black boxes" for my own learning benefit. That being said, I'm sure it does the job and it's faster & simpler. It

[gmx-users] checking simulation progress

2017-10-03 Thread Bukunmi Akinwunmi
dear gmx-users, my simulation has been running for sometime but now I want to know how long is left for the simulation to be completed. I need help with the command to analyse a running simulation. Best regards, Bukunmi -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.g

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/3/17 11:13 AM, farial tavakoli wrote: blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Thanks alot for your advxe I would really appreciate if you advice me more to sp

Re: [gmx-users] checking simulation progress

2017-10-03 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/3/17 12:03 PM, Bukunmi Akinwunmi wrote: dear gmx-users, my simulation has been running for sometime but now I want to know how long is left for the simulation to be completed. I need help with the command to analyse a running simulation. The -v option of mdrun prints a running estima

Re: [gmx-users] checking simulation progress

2017-10-03 Thread Tasneem Kausar
see gmx check -h option On 3 Oct 2017 21:33, "Bukunmi Akinwunmi" wrote: > dear gmx-users, > my simulation has been running for sometime but now I want to know how > long is left for the simulation to be completed. I need help with the > command to analyse a running simulation. > > Best regards,

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 162, Issue 7

2017-10-03 Thread zaved
> Send gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list submissions to > gromacs.org_gmx-users@maillist.sys.kth.se > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'h

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread farial tavakoli
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } So how should I split protein and ligand from each other to create  .mdp files? Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone On Tuesday,

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 10/3/17 1:08 PM, farial tavakoli wrote: blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } So how should I split protein and ligand from each other to create  .mdp files?

[gmx-users] Tutorial

2017-10-03 Thread Sergio Manzetti
Hi, is there a tutorial for importing fully charged non-peptid topologies for the AMBER FF ISBN type to GMX somewhere ? Thanks Sergio Manzetti Fjordforsk AS Midtun 6894 VangsnesNorge Org.nr. 911 659 654 Tlf: +47 57695621Økolab | Nanofactory | A

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread farial tavakoli
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Oh I am sorry. Yes  I am trying to run md on my protein peptide complex. At first you advice me to use pdb2gmx to generate a topo

Re: [gmx-users] peptide ligand

2017-10-03 Thread farial tavakoli
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px #715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white !important; } Because in tuturial , energygroups = protein JZ4So I think ,I have to seperate my ligand and Protein in .mdp files and determine

Re: [gmx-users] gromacs.org_gmx-users Digest, Vol 162, Issue 9

2017-10-03 Thread ABEL Stephane
Hi, In addition to my previous email If you have all the parameters obtained from RESP and tleap program (mol2, frcmod and lib) you could use the ACPYPE program to obtain the itp file for GROMACS See http://www.shourjya.thinkbiosolution.com/assigning-point-charges-to-non-standard-molecules

Re: [gmx-users] lower-end GPUs

2017-10-03 Thread Alex
Thanks, this is very useful! I was looking at the 1080 and the pricing is fairly acceptable. Will keep in mind about CR version. Actually, we wouldn't be buying anything except for the GPUs. It seems like a colleague of ours is unhappy with the performance of his Xeon-based workstation and we