Dear Gromacs experts,
Which option i need to use to correct the dssp image as given in the link.
(i have to get full part upto 100 ns in the box)
You can see the right side is not full in the box, i marked in the black box
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QkpFOLvOcrSyv1U6HkRorYrKgKxGCskS/view?
Hi,
does anyone have a copy of this conference paper / the conference
proceedings book (below)? If so would you be so kind to mail it to me (copy
or similar)?
"Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C., Dijkstra, E. J., Achterop, S., van
Drunen, R., van der
Spoel, D., Sijbers, A., Keegstra, H., Reitsma, B.
There are a number of ways to bias a system. Many of them are implemented
in gromacs. You will need to be more specific about what you want here.
The structures you find in the PDB are in an energy minima but these (lets
call them physical) minima may not be (lets call them theoretical) minima
of
Hi!
Thank you for your previous reply. You were right, my file was getting
modified. I had not saved the page directly but had copy-pasted it in a
textedit file.
I am again stuck, though. I was trying to run job_0.sh and when I gave the
command:
gmx grompp -f $MDP/EM/em_steep_$LAMBDA.mdp -c
$FREE
I want to calculate water SDF around C-alpha of glycine molecule. So here i
have followed the commands..
Step 2:- gmx trjconv -s nptmd.tpr -f nptmd.xtc -o abc.tng -boxcenter tric
-ur compact -pbc none
and it asks me
Select group for output
Group 0 ( System) has 1543 elements
Group 1 ( Prot
Hi All,
I am currently trying to run a simulation on the ionic liquid
1-butyl-3-methyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([Bmim][PF6]), but have run
into a few errors I am unable to solve.
I've used the following steps in my simulation so far:
a) Generated the required .pdb files for both the
Hi,
Good question! The nstcomm is the frequency at which the center of mass motion
is removed. My guess is that using short frequency for the nstcomm (e.g.
nstcomm=1 while simulation time step is 1 fs, dt=0.001) can perturbe the
system. That is, the system may not return to its starting/unpertu
Hi Marc,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Marc Hoemberger
wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I have had a similar issue on our cluster (different module files etc.) for
> me it turned out that on the actual compute nodes this module was not
> available. Thus if you run it from the command line on e.g. your l
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is a principled way to perturb molecules and then
see its energy converge to the stationary state via the simulation.
Perturbation could mean changing the coordinates of the atoms, changing
angles dihedrals etc. Anything related to the topology. I want to see this
Hi Alex,
I have had a similar issue on our cluster (different module files etc.) for
me it turned out that on the actual compute nodes this module was not
available. Thus if you run it from the command line on e.g. your login node
you might have access to this compiler / modulefile, but when movin
Hi,
I can't help you troubleshoot your use of your cluster's modules (nor guess
about what's in the rest of your run script). Talk to the people paid to do
it ;-)
Mark
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:15 PM Alex wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Mark Abraham
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:56 PM Alex wrote:
>
> > Thanks Marc.
> >
> > I removed the two EXPORT line in the script but still missing the library
> > (removing only the second line also did not help):
> >
> > ModuleCmd_Load.c(208):ERROR
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:56 PM Alex wrote:
> Thanks Marc.
>
> I removed the two EXPORT line in the script but still missing the library
> (removing only the second line also did not help):
>
> ModuleCmd_Load.c(208):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for
> 'intel/composerxe/2015.1.133'
Thanks Marc.
I removed the two EXPORT line in the script but still missing the library
(removing only the second line also did not help):
ModuleCmd_Load.c(208):ERROR:105: Unable to locate a modulefile for
'intel/composerxe/2015.1.133'
--
Hi,
It looks like you are choosing to mismanage LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Try letting
the modules do it, since it is their job.
Mark
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 20:29 Alex wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have installed the gromacs2018.1 parallel in a cluster, it works
> perfectly in the command line, of course after
Hi,
Your system is exploding, some atoms end up with coordinates of around
10^9 which then throw off the PBC code that tries to put atoms back in
the box. This will normally not happen as constraining will already
fail with such huge coordinates, I think, so technically it is a bug,
we could handl
Dear all,
I have installed the gromacs2018.1 parallel in a cluster, it works
perfectly in the command line, of course after loading some module.
But when I put the commands along with loading module commands in a bash
script to be submitted in the cluster, it crashes with the below massage:
+
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Jochen Hub wrote:
>
>
> Am 03.04.18 um 16:26 schrieb Szilárd Páll:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jochen Hub wrote:
>>>
>>>benchmar
>>>
>>> Am 29.03.18 um 20:57 schrieb Szilárd Páll:
>>>
Hi Jochen,
For that particular benchmark I only measured
Am 03.04.18 um 16:26 schrieb Szilárd Páll:
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jochen Hub wrote:
Am 29.03.18 um 20:57 schrieb Szilárd Páll:
Hi Jochen,
For that particular benchmark I only measured performance with
1,2,4,8,16 cores with a few different kinds of GPUs. It would be easy
to do th
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:41 PM, Jochen Hub wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.03.18 um 20:57 schrieb Szilárd Páll:
>
>> Hi Jochen,
>>
>> For that particular benchmark I only measured performance with
>> 1,2,4,8,16 cores with a few different kinds of GPUs. It would be easy
>> to do the runs on all possible core co
Am 29.03.18 um 20:57 schrieb Szilárd Páll:
Hi Jochen,
For that particular benchmark I only measured performance with
1,2,4,8,16 cores with a few different kinds of GPUs. It would be easy
to do the runs on all possible core counts with increments of 1, but
that won't tell a whole lot more than
On 4/3/18 5:50 AM, Joe Jordan wrote:
Gromacs 4.6 is no longer supported, so I would recommend upgrading to 2018
and using gmx select. Short of that, if you just run make_ndx and don't use
a selection sting you will get a group corresponding to NAP with the right
number of atoms.
Neither gmx s
Hi,
As Justin observed, editconf -f your.tpr -o your.pdb just works.
Mark
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscri
We haven't yet moved to Discourse ;-)
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018, 10:54 Viveca Lindahl wrote:
> Wish I could +1 the best response here :) Thanks.
>
> --
> Viveca
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Mark Abraham
> wrote:
>
> > Just say No! :-)
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 19:58 Alex wrote:
> >
> >
Dear Mark,
Thanks. I did not specify that parameter, as you correctly suggested. I'm
re-running the simulations and see what happens.
Thanks
Simone
Il lun 2 apr 2018, 17:44 Mark Abraham ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> Probably you didn't use nstfout to save forces - use gmx check -f on your
> trajectory
Hi
A quick question here, before to read this response I thought (but never
tested) that it was possible to extract a pdb from a tpr since we use one to
generate a tpr with grompp. So how is store the atomic coordinates of a system
in a tpr file ?
Thanks
---
Gromacs 4.6 is no longer supported, so I would recommend upgrading to 2018
and using gmx select. Short of that, if you just run make_ndx and don't use
a selection sting you will get a group corresponding to NAP with the right
number of atoms.
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, abhisek Mondal
wrote:
I'm using v4.6.2
$make_ndx -f npt.gro
> r 306 (residue num of ligand)
> name 24 Ligand
This should do the work right ?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:07 PM, Joe Jordan wrote:
> I got a group with the right number of atoms when I tried it. What version
> of gromacs are you using and what selection s
I got a group with the right number of atoms when I tried it. What version
of gromacs are you using and what selection string are you using?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:32 AM, abhisek Mondal
wrote:
> Location of the files:
> https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B6O-
> L5Y7BiGJfmQ4N2FpblBEcF
Location of the files:
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B6O-L5Y7BiGJfmQ4N2FpblBEcFNxaDZnaGpsUFFEUlotVWFjajR0UFFHNk5aYlhoSHVTWkU
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:53 PM, Joe Jordan wrote:
> Can you post the gro file and the resulting index file?
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:20 AM, abhisek Mond
Can you post the gro file and the resulting index file?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:20 AM, abhisek Mondal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just having some issue creating index file for umbrella sampling.
>
> I have a ligand:
> Group20 (NAP) has73 elements
>
> Now when I run following command:
> gmx m
Hi,
I'm just having some issue creating index file for umbrella sampling.
I have a ligand:
Group20 (NAP) has73 elements
Now when I run following command:
gmx make_ndx -f npt.gro
and try to add NAP for index.ndx, only 6 elements were being added.
I don't understand the problem here.
NA
Hello,
I want to do the Spatial Distribution Function,
I tried to follow the manual gmx spatial.
I am following the five-step protocol which is given in gmx spatial manual..
1) I have an index file ndx_CaOw.ndx (which contains the C-alpha and all
the Ow's of water molecules, Is this index good
Wish I could +1 the best response here :) Thanks.
--
Viveca
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Just say No! :-)
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 19:58 Alex wrote:
>
> > Or, and that is a very peculiar option, genion with -conc 0. :)
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> > On 3/30/2018 4:28 AM,
34 matches
Mail list logo