Dear All,
I have converted a xtc file into gro file and then want to
analyse it with my own fortran code. The same calculation can be done with
gromacs commands from xtc file. My question is will I miss some sort of
data if I use gro file as there is a precision issue between xtc and gr
On 5/2/19 6:59 AM, Saumyak Mukherjee wrote:
Dear All,
I have an insulin hexamer, which (because of PBC) apparently breaks into
pieces after simulation.
To make the molecule whole, I use the following command:
gmx trjconv -f traj.xtc -s md.tpr -o traj_whole.xtc -pbc cluster
or
gmx trjconv
On 5/2/19 3:19 AM, vijayakumar gosu wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,
I have simulated a phosphorylated protein with 3 replicas (for 300ns). I
concatenated the three replicas (total 900ns) for the analysis
(1_2_3_trj_50ps.xtc). When I perform analysis the protein does not include
the 3 phospho resi
On 5/2/19 5:13 AM, Faezeh Pousaneh wrote:
Hi,
I notice that gmx trjconv does not produce the exact .gro file (slightly
different box lengths).
I mean when i run following command
gmx trjconv -f NPT.trr -s NPT.tpr -o f.gro -pbc mol -b 2000
I get slightly different box length than whe
Dear all,
I tried to apply a static electric field across a water box. I used
anisotropic pressure coupling. Details of the pressure coupling is given below.
pcoupl = Parrinello-Rahman
pcoupltype = anisotropic
tau_p = 5.0
compressibility =
Dear All,
I have an insulin hexamer, which (because of PBC) apparently breaks into
pieces after simulation.
To make the molecule whole, I use the following command:
gmx trjconv -f traj.xtc -s md.tpr -o traj_whole.xtc -pbc cluster
or
gmx trjconv -f traj.xtc -s md.tpr -o traj_whole.xtc -pbc mol
Yes it is normal to correct .xtc file through -pbc flag
On Thu, May 2, 2019, 12:57 PM Sankaran SV . <119013...@sastra.ac.in> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We are investigating the hydration dynamics of membrane proteins (AQP
> embedded in DPPC membrane). The topology and the mdp files for simulations
>
When you are trying to join two .xtc files phosphorylated residues will be
broken. They remain intact when you generate the pdb files or any other
analysis.xvg from one and single .xtc file that you have suggested before
running md simulation
On Thu, May 2, 2019, 12:19 PM vijayakumar gosu
wrote:
Hi,
I notice that gmx trjconv does not produce the exact .gro file (slightly
different box lengths).
I mean when i run following command
gmx trjconv -f NPT.trr -s NPT.tpr -o f.gro -pbc mol -b 2000
I get slightly different box length than when I run gmx energy ... and
select box-X,Y,Z.
Dear all,
We are investigating the hydration dynamics of membrane proteins (AQP
embedded in DPPC membrane). The topology and the mdp files for simulations
was obtained from the MemprotMD database (mdp file:
http://memprotmd.bioch.ox.ac.uk/). We modified the temperature of
simulation to 310 K since
Power9 (for HPC) is 4-way SMT, so make sure to try 1,2, and 4 threads per
core (stride 4, 2, and 1 respectively). Especially if you are offloading
all force computing to the GPU, what remains on the couch may not be able
to benefit from more than 1-2 threads per core.
--
Szilárd
On Thu, May 2, 2
Dear Gromacs users,
I have simulated a phosphorylated protein with 3 replicas (for 300ns). I
concatenated the three replicas (total 900ns) for the analysis
(1_2_3_trj_50ps.xtc). When I perform analysis the protein does not include
the 3 phospho residues. However when I analyzed each replica inde
12 matches
Mail list logo