I tried all the options.. I load gro file instead of xtc. At zero frame I
gave representations new cartoon + secondary structure.. then I calculate
sec str details by going on vmd timeline.
I don't know what I am missing.. I am doing the same which I used all the
time.
Because these are two totally
Dear Rebeta
Did you visualise your trajectory? If not then kindly first do that.
If the protein in your CG simulation is fluctuating a lot then the rmsd of
3.5 can make sense.
Also, prepare a separate index for protein BB(backbone) bead only and use
it in rmsd fitting as well as rmsd calculation.
On 1/13/20 9:22 AM, Qing Lv wrote:
Thank you, Justin. I start each run by randomly generate velocities at 300K,
and each run is quite stable. So, is it appropriate to regard the first 20 ps
(this is a QM/MM MD) of each run as the equilibration and just discard this 20
ps in the final wham a
On 1/13/20 9:15 AM, Sundari wrote:
Yes, Sir, I made the gro file for a particular time by using "gmx
trjconv" command ( also checked with -pbc mol, whole, no_jump options )
but every time the 2ndary structure visualization in vmd is different from
dssp sequence of residues in gromacs. Fox ex
Dear Gromacs users
I am facing this error during free energy calculation of protein-ligand for
which I have applied restrained to some atoms of protein residue and
ligand.
A list of missing interactions:
Restraint Pot. of 1 missing 1
Molecule type 'Protein'
the first 10 missing int
Hi,
I am new user of GROMACS. I have run coarse-grained umbrella sampling
simulation in GROMACS. I had prepared the system in CHARMM-GUI. After
running the simulation, now I want to calculate the RMSD of the protein. I
have used the following command to remove pbc effect first-
gmx trjconv -s 0A.g
Hi kenny, thanks for getting back to me.
I use something similar to what you've suggested to deal with periodic
boundary conditions. My current issue is that vmd will place a bond between
two atoms that are close together in the first frame of the visualization
even if those atoms aren't linked in
Dear all,
I have found in some old literatures where force field
parmetrizations were done, they have used group cut-off scheme which was
default in gromacs version then. Now, if I want to use those parameters in
updated gromacs version, do I have to take cutoff scheme as group ? Or can
I
Hello all,
I am a brand new MD/GROMACS user, and I have been trying to learn how to use
GROMACS for coarse-grained simulations using the MARTINI forcefield. I was
going through a tutorial on coarse-graining from the MARTINI website
(http://cgmartini.nl/index.php/tutorials-general-introduction-g
Hi,
I'm not sure what you mean by "bonds that aren't in the simulation", but from
my experience, converting your .gro file with gmx trjconv using the -pbc mol
and -ur compact options usually gives a clean visualisation. If necessary, you
can also use the -center option to center a specific stru
Hello everyone,
I have a problem related with a molecule with inter- and intra-chain
disulfide bridges. When I convert my pdb file into a gromacs file, all the
disulfide bridges are still connected (inter- and intra-chain). However,
when I perform a short optimization of the structure (in v
*thanks sahil *
*but i am interested in lipid molecule conversion not protein. I think
pdb2gmx will work for protein molecules only.*
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http:
I didn't get you. So your problem is solved using trr file or not?
- Message from Lalehan Ozalp -
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:53:54 +0300
From: Lalehan Ozalp
Reply-To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] cannot load the xtc file (without PBC) to VMD
To: gmx-us
Thank you, but I haven't tried with a trr file and actually the last .trr
file I've produced is em.trr.
Thanks,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:40 PM wrote:
> Hii
> Have you tried with the .trr file? Try the same procedure with .trr file.
> Thanks
> - Message from Lalehan Ozalp -
>
Hey,
You could use pdb2gmx on the CHARMM-GUI ".pdb" output. The -ignh flag
allows for ignoring preexisting hydrogen atoms if that's really
required.
Cheers,
Sahil
On 2020-01-14 12:23, Yogesh Sharma wrote:
> Greetings,
> hey, I want to convert the charmm gui generated pdb (membrane + protein
15 matches
Mail list logo