Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019.4 - cudaStreamSynchronize failed issue

2019-12-04 Thread Chenou Zhang
eForce cards may be flaky? > > -- > Szilárd > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:47 PM Chenou Zhang wrote: > > > We tried the same gmx settings in 2019.4 with different protein systems. > > And we got the same weird potential energy jump within 1000 steps. > > >

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019.4 - cudaStreamSynchronize failed issue

2019-12-04 Thread Chenou Zhang
3.61574e-06 ``` On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Abraham wrote: > Hi, > > What driver version is reported in the respective log files? Does the error > persist if mdrun -notunepme is used? > > Mark > > On Mon., 2 Dec. 2019, 21:18 Chenou Zhang, wrote: >

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019.4 - cudaStreamSynchronize failed issue

2019-12-03 Thread Chenou Zhang
gy at the end of it. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Abraham wrote: > Hi, > > What driver version is reported in the respective log files? Does the error > persist if mdrun -notunepme is used? > > Mark > > On Mon., 2 Dec. 2019, 21:18 Chenou Zhang, wrote: > > &

Re: [gmx-users] Gromacs 2019.4 - cudaStreamSynchronize failed issue

2019-12-02 Thread Chenou Zhang
nepme option and get you updated. Chenou On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:13 PM Mark Abraham wrote: > Hi, > > What driver version is reported in the respective log files? Does the error > persist if mdrun -notunepme is used? > > Mark > > On Mon., 2 Dec. 2019, 21:18 Chenou Zh

[gmx-users] Gromacs 2019.4 - cudaStreamSynchronize failed issue

2019-12-02 Thread Chenou Zhang
Hi Gromacs developers, I'm currently running gromacs 2019.4 on our university's HPC cluster. To fully utilize the GPU nodes, I followed notes on http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/current/user-guide/mdrun-performance.html. And here is the command I used for my runs. ``` gmx mdrun -v -s $TPR