Re: [gmx-users] Implicit solvent improvement in Gromacs 5.1.2

2016-11-09 Thread Hai Nguyen
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Mark Abraham wrote: > Hi, > > There's been no active work since 4.5 and no plans I've heard of. I hear > AMBER is pretty good at it on GPUs :-) > > Since Mark mentioned AMBER, just FYI for @Christian: AMBER have new and more accurate model (GB-Neck2) too. Hai >

Re: [gmx-users] can we analyse Gromacs trajectory with jupyter?

2016-06-24 Thread Hai Nguyen
ere: http://amber-md.github.io/pytraj/latest/tutorials/interface_with_mdtraj_.html Hai > > On 06/24/2016 04:36 PM, Hai Nguyen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> cpptraj is able to read TRR format too. cpptraj can read a pdb file as >> Topology, so no need to do any conversion to "

Re: [gmx-users] can we analyse Gromacs trajectory with jupyter?

2016-06-24 Thread Hai Nguyen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 7:20 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: > Hi, > > Not that I know of. From the point of view of someone who already has a > GROMACS trajectory, the underlying cpptraj tool has support for reading > .gro and .pdb, but not .xtc or .tng, and you'd also have to decide whether > you need

Re: [gmx-users] converted topology from amber to gromacs

2016-02-18 Thread Hai Nguyen
Hi You should know which AMBER force field when you made the topology file. (How did you make it?) Hai On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:56 AM, mohammad r wrote: > Hi gromacs users, > I've generatedinitial structure of my system by using ambertools (topology > andcoordinate files) and converted it to