Re: [gmx-users] Simulation crashed, fatal error: Bond length not finite and warning: Pressure scaling more than 1%.

2018-05-25 Thread Kroon, P.C.
You equilibrations are probably too short. There are some pretty slow processes in lipid membranes. Peter On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Quyen V. Vu wrote: > Hi Zeined, > Have you check the energy , the box fluctuations and pressure deviations ? > Best, > Quyen > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at

Re: [gmx-users] ion channel in lipid bilayer

2018-02-19 Thread Kroon, P.C.
hain_B 1 > Protein_chain_B21 > Protein_chain_C 1 > Protein_chain_C21 > Protein_chain_D 1 > Protein_chain_D21 > LIG 1 > POT 118 > POPG96 > ''' > > Insane script is for Martini, am I rig

Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: ion channel in lipid bilayer

2018-02-18 Thread Kroon, P.C.
Hi Alex, Try either insane.py, or charmm-gui. I can't provide links, since I'm on my phone. You may need to generate the topology (itp) of the protein, which you can do with calling pdb2gmx on just the protein. You should have a topology (itp) of your favourite lipid. Peter On 18 Feb 2018 13:54

Re: [gmx-users] how to reimage PBC based on distance to a given selection without recentering or otherwise changing atomic coordinates

2017-02-06 Thread Kroon, P.C.
7;re very happy to make things work better! > > Mark > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:04 Kroon, P.C. wrote: > > > Alternatively, center it on an interfacial residue. pbc cluster doesn't > > always work, unfortunately. > > > > Peter > > > >

Re: [gmx-users] how to reimage PBC based on distance to a given selection without recentering or otherwise changing atomic coordinates

2017-02-06 Thread Kroon, P.C.
Alternatively, center it on an interfacial residue. pbc cluster doesn't always work, unfortunately. Peter On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:56 PM, Christopher Neale < chris.ne...@alum.utoronto.ca> wrote: > Awesome Mark, thanks! It works. > > I filed a bug about a nonexistent -clustercenter option mention

Re: [gmx-users] temperature coupling groups for homogeneous mixtures/ ionic liquids?

2017-01-16 Thread Kroon, P.C.
Hi, yes it matters. In general tc-grps=system is better/correct, unless the thermal energy transfer across your system is hampered (e.g. a lipid membrane, or a large protein). It hasn't changed with versions. In addition, the Berendsen thermostat produces the wrong ensemble. To check previous simu

Re: [gmx-users] Conversion between nonbonded charmm NBFIX and gromacs cross terms

2016-07-22 Thread Kroon, P.C.
As an aside: Martini forcefield parameters are available in Gromacs format on the Martini website. See http://cgmartini.nl/index.php/force-field-parameters Peter On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Marlon Sidore wrote: > Thanks for your answer, that solved everything. > > Marlon > > Marlon Sidore

Re: [gmx-users] MARTINI simulation of protein-protein recognition

2016-04-18 Thread Kroon, P.C.
t; membrane (A) and one in the water (B) and simulate it independently 10 > times to collect statistics about associations of A and B during those > runs. The problems that I don't know how to put 2 different unbound > proteins in the MARTINI system. > > James > > 2016-04-18

Re: [gmx-users] MARTINI simulation of protein-protein recognition

2016-04-18 Thread Kroon, P.C.
Hi, I assume you want to study the binding of your water soluble protein to your membrane(protein). DAFT was created to do just this. DOI: 10.1021/ct5010092 Peter On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:37 PM, James Starlight wrote: > Dear Gromacs users! > > I am looking for some tutorial for the MARTINI si

Re: [gmx-users] MARTINI crushing

2016-04-14 Thread Kroon, P.C.
; >> > >> that is waht related to constraints in my mdp > >> constraints = none > >> constraint_algorithm = Lincs > >> unconstrained_start = no > >> lincs_order = 2 > >> lincs_warnangle = 30 &g

Re: [gmx-users] MARTINI crushing

2016-04-14 Thread Kroon, P.C.
light wrote: > an question: might the bigger -rdd like 1.8 or 2.0 produce ssmth bad > in simulation? generally I found that with rdd 1.8 the siduation is > better, also I reduced number of CPU for that job from 256 to 128 and > it works OK by now! > > Gleb > > 2016-04

Re: [gmx-users] MARTINI crushing

2016-04-14 Thread Kroon, P.C.
Hi James, 1) use a newer version of Gromacs 2) try passing -rdd 1.4 or even 1.6 to mdrun. The bonds in Elnedyn are so long and flexible they occasionally confuse gromacs' domain decomposition. Peter On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:49 AM, James Starlight wrote: > Dear Gromacs Users! > > I faced with

Re: [gmx-users] Question for Gromacs Users

2016-04-13 Thread Kroon, P.C.
This is a known bug in Martinize; you applied the correct fix. And Justin is right, it would have been better to post this kind of question on the Martini forum (www.cgmartini.nl); I'm also rather sure that this answer is on there somewhere. Peter On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Justin Lemkul w

Re: [gmx-users] Problem compiling Gromacs 5.1

2015-08-20 Thread Kroon, P.C.
Just use your favourite text editor. Peter On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:10 AM, wrote: > Line 52 of cmake/FindSphinx.cmake file is written below. > string(REGEX REPLACE "Sphinx \\([^)]*\\) ([^ ]+)" "\\1" > SPHINX_EXECUTABLE_VERSION "${SPHINX_VERSION_OUTPUT_VARIABLE}") > > Can you tell me how I can