Dear users,
I have a corrupted .xtc file.
I can read only part of the whole frame in VMD.
When I gmx check the .edr file, there is no problem with 5001 frames.
However if I do gmx check the .xtc file, then I get only 2954 frames out of
50001 frames.
I used Gromacs 2019.6 with CUDA on a single no
mended?
>
> It is not like that...gromos is not compatible with gromacs... decission
> need to be taken depending on what system you want to simulate and what you
> are expecting from the simulation.
> On Tue 18 Feb, 2020, 6:27 AM Myunggi Yi, wrote:
>
> > Dear users,
>
Dear users,
As the same as the title,
Are Gromos force fields not recommended in Gromacs?
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
*
Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:20 PM Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 1/15/20 10:05 PM, Myunggi Yi wrote:
> > Dear Dr. Justin Lemkul,
> >
> > Can you explain why the D-H-A is 150?
> >
> > If H-D-A is 30, then D-H-A should be smaller than 150 degrees.
> > Since th
Dear Dr. Justin Lemkul,
Can you explain why the D-H-A is 150?
If H-D-A is 30, then D-H-A should be smaller than 150 degrees.
Since the sum of interior angles of a triangle should be 180 degrees...
See the following triangle.
H
D
Dear Quin,
Since the lab temperature is around 300K, people who want to reproduce some
specific (in vitro) experiment results run simulation at 300K.
What is your target? Experimental condition? body temperature?
It's up to you.
If your simulations show significantly different results by 10K dif
18, 2019 at 11:22 AM Justin Lemkul wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 8:58 PM Myunggi Yi wrote:
>
> > Thank you Dr. Lemkel,
> >
> > I don't have ions in my simulation. It's a neutral system with a protein
> in
> > membrane bilayer with solvent.
> >
>
> On 7/17/19 8:39 PM, Myunggi Yi wrote:
> > Dear users,
> >
> > I want to run a simulation with a polarizable force field.
> >
> > How and where can I get Drude force field for the current version of
> > Gromacs?
>
> Everything you need to know:
ns. Which one should I use?
Or, it there a way to modify the force field format to use the current
version of Gromacs?, Then I will modify the format.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:43 AM Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/19 8:39 PM, Myunggi Yi wrote:
> > Dear users,
> &
Thank you.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:43 AM Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/19 8:39 PM, Myunggi Yi wrote:
> > Dear users,
> >
> > I want to run a simulation with a polarizable force field.
> >
> > How and where can I get Drude force field
Dear users,
I want to run a simulation with a polarizable force field.
How and where can I get Drude force field for the current version of
Gromacs?
Thank you.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posti
Dear users,
How or where can I get the Drude polarizable force field file for current
Gromacs version?
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mail
Dear users,
I am modifying top files to prepare my own n- and c-termini.
Can someone explain why charges in the NH2 residue in "aminoacids.n.tdb"
file and "aminoacids.rtp" are different?
Thank you in advance.
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/
ilárd
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Myunggi Yi wrote:
> > Does it work?
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/open?id=1n5m1tNGbnV7oZnuAEgZ7gSP6qA6HluNl
> >
> > How about this?
> >
> >
> > Myunggi Yi
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 201
Thanks.
I used the exactly same program (same installation and same environment
variable).
How come this error depends on the *.mdp file?
I don't get it with typical simulations such as md with PME etc,
but I get it with this Dry_Martini mdp file (using sd, reaction field etc.).
Myung
Does it work?
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1n5m1tNGbnV7oZnuAEgZ7gSP6qA6HluNl
How about this?
Myunggi Yi
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Attachments can't be accepted on the list - please upload to a file sharing
> service and sha
I see.
I am trying again.
ves
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1n5m1tNGbnV7oZnuAEgZ7gSP6qA6HluNl>
Myunggi Yi (이명기, Ph. D.), Professor
Department of Biomedical Engineering (의공학과 bme.pknu.ac.kr), College of
Engineering
Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Mechanical &
I am attaching the file.
Thank you.
Myunggi Yi
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Szilárd Páll
wrote:
> Again, please share the exact log files / description of inputs. What
> does "bad performance" mean?
> --
> Szilárd
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 5:31 PM, My
entation/Errors
---
So I did run simulation with the following command.
gmx mdrun -deffnm md -ntmpi 1
Now the performance is extremely bad.
Since yesterday, the log file still reporting the first step's energy.
2. This is the second question. Why?
Can anyone help?
Myunggi
well (option -ntmpi).
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
---
Can anyone help?
Thank you for any help in advance.
Myunggi Yi
--
Gromacs Users ma
FYI
I found a typo in dry_martini_v2.1_lipids.itp
ERROR 1 [file dry_martini_v2.1_lipids.itp, line 690]:
Duplicate atom index (11) in angles
If this is correct, then modify the line 690
11 11 12 2 ma_ccc
to
10 11 12 2 ma_ccc
Myunggi Yi
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
t; Mark
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:37 PM Myunggi Yi wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your help.
> >
> > Then how can the simulation be continued without previous cpt file
> > (information)?
> >
> > Or, should I use another way to extend the simulations?
> &g
Thank you all.
Have a great day.
Myunggi
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Mark Abraham
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See
> http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2018-latest/user-guide/managing-
> simulations.html#extending-a-tpr-file
>
> Mark
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 a
Thank you for your help.
Then how can the simulation be continued without previous cpt file
(information)?
Or, should I use another way to extend the simulations?
Myunggi
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 1/29/18 9:07 AM, Myunggi Yi wrote:
>
&
Thank you for any help, in advance.
Myunggi Yi
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests v
Peter,
(ignoring full precision) Are the thermostat and barostat computed by
coordinates and velocities, in principle ?
Myunggi Yi (이명기, Ph. D.), Professor
Department of Biomedical Engineering (의공학과 bme.pknu.ac.kr), College of
Engineering
Interdisciplinary Program of Biomedical Mechanical
Peter,
I see. Thank you for the correction.
MY
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://m
1. In principle, MD can be restarted if there are coordinates and
velocities on the snapshot.
2. Even if you don't have velocity, you can assign random velocity with the
specific temperature.
In this case, you lose continuity of simulation. Don't worry.
If you run same simulation with the exactly
28 matches
Mail list logo