Hi Abid,
To extend a run I use something like this
For 50 ns
tpbconv -s previous.tpr -extend 5 -o next.tpr
mdrun -s next.tpr -cpi previous.cpt
Rohit
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 4:03 AM, Abid Channa
wrote:
> Hi gromacs users,
>
> I am working membrane complex simulation of 20
> ns, 100, s
Hi Soumadwip,
I my understanding this error occurs when GROMACS can't distribute your job
on the number of cores you are asking. Try to change the number of cores
from 80 to something else, probably a fewer number of cores.
I had this error once and I figured out that was the reason, but I am not
Hi Somlata,
For GROMACS to recognize your FES moiety you will have to determine the
force field parameters for the forcefield which you want to use and then
update the GROMACS databases.
Without GOMACS having the necessary parameters for the atoms in your FES
moiety in its forcefield database you
Hi there,
I am trying to fit a protein to a reference structure using the command
below
trjconv -s run.trp -f run.xtc -o run-fit.xtc -fit progressive
I am using protein for least square and system for output.
This command always worked for me but for this particular protein the side
chains get
Hi there,
I am trying to us trj_cavity to detect cavity formation and volume in my
simulation. The plugin installed with no problem but no matter how I run
it, it always gives segmentation fault.
Can anyone please help me out with this. Alternatively if anyone knows an
alternative software to det
an artefact and not that its actually broken. But is there
a way to make then look whole. I tried the option whole with -pbc but
couldn't figure out what it actually did.
Thanks
Rohit
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 10/29/14 8:08 AM, Rohit Farmer
Hi Guys,
I am trying to centre a protein complex using this command
trjconv -pbc mol -center -ur compact -s em.tpr -f md_0.xtc -o
md_0_center.xtc
I selected "protein" in the first option and then "system" in the second
for output but I received the following error
Floating point exception1900.0
Thanks Justin
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote:
>
>
> On 10/16/14 1:24 PM, Rohit Farmer wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have recently converted the whole of GAFF parameters database to Gromacs
>> format to use with the AMBER 99SB ILDN forcefi
Hi All,
I have recently converted the whole of GAFF parameters database to Gromacs
format to use with the AMBER 99SB ILDN forcefield. My intention was to
simulate a number of ligands which I covalently bound to a residue in the
protein. So if I bind something to a residue then I am effectively add