Dear Gromacs users
I am doing free energy calculation of the protein-ligand system in gromacs
2020 in which I am annihilating ligand by removing charges and vdw
interactions. During Vdw removal I am facing lincs warning and my system
crashes by generating different pdb structures. I have tried to
Thank you very much, Justin, for your valuable feedback.
Regards.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe
Dear Gromacs users
I am using amber99sb-ildn.ff force field for protein and I used GAFF for
ligand parameterization.
I tried different options e.g using constraint =all bonds as well as
h-bonds. Reducing the time step to 1 fs but still, I could not solve the
problem and get lincs warning production
Dear Justin
I want to get the equilibrium value for bond, angle and dihedral restraints
to use in free energy calculation as mentioned in:-
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jacs.6b11467
Looking forward to your kind suggestions, please.
Thanks.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please s
Dear Gromacs users
I did 50ns MD simulation of a protein-ligand complex. From this trajectory,
I extracted region of trajectory having stable rmsd and generated an
average structure. I want to run this average structure to get an idea of
setting some restraints. but when I do gmx pdb2gmx I get foll
Dear Justin
I have removed the blank lines but getting a new warning while doing gmx
pdb2gmx:-
WARNING: Duplicate line found in or between hackblock and rtp entries
I am not getting what else is wrong. Could you please help me to figure out.
I have shared the file on the following link:-
https:/
Dear Justin
I have shared the files for the users mailing list on the following link.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bfaq8z8iqojdm0r/Atom_type_error%20files.zip?dl=0
Thanks and Regards.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/
Dear Gromacs users
I am facing a problem between different versions of gromacs for gmx
pdb2gmx. I have a protein-ligand system, I did all the necessary steps
mentioned in gromacs manual for adding new residue to force field. When I
run this in gromacs 2019 it gives me a warning as below:-
Fatal err
Dear Gromacs users
I have tried to sort out this problem with gromacs 2020 and 2019 versions.
I gromacs 2019, It gives:-
All occupancies are one
Opening force field file ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/atomtypes.atp
Atomtype 106
Invalid format:
However, It generates a topology file.
In gromacs 2020, it gives:
Dear Gromacs users
I have tried to sort out this problem with gromacs 2020 and 2019 versions.
I gromacs 2019, It gives:-
All occupancies are one
Opening force field file ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/atomtypes.atp
Atomtype 106
Invalid format:
However, It generates a topology file.
In gromacs 2020, it gives:
Dear Gromacs users
I am facing a strange problem while doing pdb2gmx:-
When I use the command:-
gmx pdb2gmx -f 74A-G.pdb -o 74A-G.gro
It shows the following:-
going to rename ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/aminoacids.r2b
Opening force field file ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/aminoacids.r2b
going to rename ./amber99sb-
Dear Justin
As per table 5.14 in manual, For angle restraints it selects
[image: image.png]
Also in manual under heading *Angle restraints*, it is mentioned that these
are used to restrain the angle between two pairs of particles or between
one pair of particles and the 𝑧-axis.
Could you please c
Dear Gromacs users
I am putting some restraints on bonds angles and dihedrals during free
energy calculations for which the topology file section is as below:-
; distance restraints
[ bonds ]
;i j type r0A r1A r2AfcAr0B r1B r2B
fcB
7968 21310 0.382
Dear Justin and Qinghua
I am using gromacs 2020 for analysis and dssp version on my system
is 2.2.1. Which version of dssp would be compatible with gromacs 2020?
Qinghua, I am already using the stripped trajectory. Any suggestions would
be appreciated.
Thanks.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
Dear Gromacs users
I am doing an analysis of protein-ligand MD simulation of 150ns. I am
trying to calculate secondary structure as below:-
gmx do_dssp -f md_noPBC.xtc -s md.tpr -o ss.xpm -tu ns -dt 1
But I am getting segmentation fault error.
Reading file md.tpr, VERSION 2020-UNCHECKED (single p
Dear Gromacs users
I am restarting a simulation with the following command:-
mpirun gmx_mpi mdrun -s md10.tpr -cpi md10_prev.cpt -append
However, I am getting following error message. All the below-named files
are there in my directory but it still complains the same.
Inconsistency in user input:
Dear Gromacs users
I am running an MD simulation of the protein-ligand complex. At the start
of the production run, I am getting this warning. What does it mean and how
should I fix it?
*WARNING: There are no atom pairs for dispersion correction*
Thanks in advance.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailin
Dear Gromacs users
I am running an MD simulation of the protein-ligand complex. At the start
of the production run, I am getting this warning. What does it mean and how
should I fix it?
*WARNING: There are no atom pairs for dispersion correction*
Thanks in advance.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailin
Dear Gromacs users
I ran an MD simulation for 3ns and from the last coordinates started a free
energy calculation for 3ns. My system is well equilibrated but after 710725
steps I am getting Lincs warning every time as below:-
WARNING: There are no atom pairs for dispersion correction
starting mdru
Dear Chris
Thank you very much for giving your comprehensive information on my mdp
options.
In my current simulation, I am trying to switch off coulombic interactions
while keeping VDW on.
In gromacs manual, it is mentioned that with parallel simulations and/or
non-bonded force calculation on the G
Dear Gromacs users
I am running a free energy calculation, my simulation crashes and generates
different PDB structures I have well equilibrated the system before going
to the production and the system seems stable. My input file for production
run is as below:-
; Run control
integrator
Dear Gromacs users
I am calculating a dihedral angle between certain atoms by following
command:-
gmx angle -type dihedral -f md_1000ps.xtc -n dihedral.ndx -ov group.xvg -of
trans.xvg
Group 0 ( dihedral1) has 4 elements
Group 1 ( dihedral2) has 4 elements
Group 2 (
Dear Gromacs users
I am running a free energy test calculation and using position restraints
for all of the system. At the end of pressure equilibration I am
getting negative average pressure as below:-
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
---
Dear Subhomoi
Thanks for your reply.
I was doing the following:-
discarding 1 ns trajectory by the following command:-
gmx trjconv -f md.xtc -s md.gro -n index.ndx -b 1000 -e 2000 -o
md_1000ps.xtc
Extracting average structure by the following command:-
gmx rmsf -s md.tpr -f md_1000ps.xtc -o rmsf
Dear Gromacs users
I want to get the average structure of a 10ns simulation by discarding
earlier 1ns run. What is the best way to get the average structure?
Thanks in advance.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-U
Dear Gromacs users
I am restraining three dihedral angles between atoms of two
different residues. when I measure it using the following command:-
gmx angle -type dihedral -f md_prod.xtc -n dihedral.ndx -ov group.xvg -of
trans.xvg
I am getting one of my dihedrals graphs as mentioned in the link.
Dear Gromacs users
I am restraining three dihedral angles between atoms of two
different residues. when I measure it using the following command:-
gmx angle -type dihedral -f md_prod.xtc -n dihedral.ndx -ov group.xvg -of
trans.xvg
I am getting one of my dihedrals graphs as mentioned in the link.
Dear Gromacs users
I am posting this problem third time in hope to get some suggestions
regarding my problem.
I am doing a test calculation in MD simulation between ligand and a protein
residue for bond angle and dihedral restraints. I have set them in my
topology file as below:-
; distance restra
Dear Gromacs users
I want to calculate the dihedral angle over the simulation time. I tried
following commands:-
gmx mk_angndx -s topol.tpr -type dihedral
which generates an index file for dihedral angles then running:-
gmx angle -f md_prod.trr -n angle.ndx -type dihedral
gives following group o
Dear Justin, thank you for your reply. I have also tried adding ACE and
NME as below but it didn't work.
1ACE HC1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 0. 0.
1ACE CT2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 0. 0.
1ACE HC3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0. 0
Dear Gromacs users
I am doing a test calculation in MD simulation between ligand and a protein
residue for bond angle and dihedral restraints. I have set them in my
topology file as below:-
; distance restraints
[ bonds ]
;ij type r0A r1A r2AfcAr0B r1B
r2B
Thank you, Alessandra, for your reply.
I have tried TER in the PDB file but it doesn't work. It requires an N and
C terminal for amino acid residue. I have prepared residue in avogadros and
used these coordinates.
ATOM 1 N PHE A 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.00 0.00
N1+
ATOM 2
Dear Gromacs users
I am getting the following message while running an energy minimization:-
There is no domain decomposition for 32 ranks that is compatible with the
given box and a minimum cell size of 1.85723 nm
I am not using any distance restraint, and selecting box size by the
following com
Dear Gromacs users
I am trying to make a system with 1 single amino acid(PHE) and 1 Ligand
when I run pdb2gmx it gives me error:-
Fatal error:
In the chosen force field there is no residue type for 'PHE' as a standalone
(starting & ending) residue
I added ACE and NME terminals as below in the gro
where I am doing
wrong?
I will be really grateful.
Thanks.
Sadaf Rani
P.hD. visiting scholar
Lancaster University
Uk
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromac
7909 7908 3437 3439 1-167.75 0.00.0-69.050.0
41.840
7909 7908 3437 3433 1-172.77 0.00.0 -172.770.0
41.840
Can anyone please suggest me how should I fix this? or where I am doing
wrong?
I will be really grateful.
Thanks
Sadaf Rani
P.hD. visiting
16 14:28:08 2020
How should I set the minimization energy of my system as it crashes after
some steps of nvt equilibration?
Thanks
Sadaf Rani
Ph.D. visiting student
Lancaster university
Uk
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_
Dear Gromacs users
I want to run energy minimization in steps
first to remove clashes with ions, second keeping position of heavy atoms
fixed and thirdly removing all constraints. How can I set this in mdp file
for ions and protein atoms?
Thanks
Sadaf Rani
Ph.D. visiting student
Lancaster
different pdb structures. How
should I solve this
Any suggestions will really be appreciated.
Thanks.
Sadaf Rani
Visiting Ph.D. student
Lancaster University
Uk
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
anyone please suggest me what could be wrong during my simulation and
how should I fix it?
Thank you
Sadaf Rani
Ph.D. visiting student
Lancaster University
Uk
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting
Dear Gromacs users
I am getting following message in my log file during MD simulation:--
---
Program: gmx mdrun, version 2018.1
Source file: src/gromacs/mdlib/minimize.cpp (line 582)
Function:void write_em_traj(_IO_FILE *, t_commrec *, gm
Dear Gromacs users
I am doing free energy calculation of protein-ligand complex and getting
again n again same error:-
Not all bonded interactions have been properly assigned to the domain
decomposition cells
A list of missing interactions:
Dih. Rest. of 3 missing 1
Could anyo
eps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
Potential Energy = -2.2680185e+06
Maximum force = 6.3521606e+02 on atom 4653
Norm of force = 3.6713926e+00
Should I use double precision for energy minimization?
I need your suggestions,
please.
Thanks
Sadaf Rani
--
Gromacs Users mailin
max < 10.
Potential Energy = -2.2680185e+06
Maximum force = 6.3521606e+02 on atom 4653
Norm of force = 3.6713926e+00
Should I use double precision for energy minimization?
I need your suggestions,
please.
Thanks
Sadaf Rani
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the arch
initial
topology had some issue it should not work for any system.
Could you please suggest me how should I fix this error?
Thanks
Sadaf Rani
Ph.D. visiting student
Lancaster University
United kingdom
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at
http://www.gromacs.org/Support
Dear Gromacs users
I am simulating the free energy of binding of a ligand with protein using
the dual topology method. I am getting the following message in log file:-
*There are 28 atoms and 29 charges for free energy perturbation*
I have 27 atoms in ligand plus two Na+ ions, It should give an eq
Dear Gromacs users
I am trying to run a free energy calculation of ligand with protein in
which I am going to transform electrostatics going from lambda 0 to 1 when
vdw interactions and restraints are there, and in the second step
transforming vdw interactions while switching off electrostatics.
T
Dear Gromacs users
I am facing this error during free energy calculation of protein-ligand for
which I have applied restrained to some atoms of protein residue and
ligand.
A list of missing interactions:
Restraint Pot. of 1 missing 1
Molecule type 'Protein'
the first 10 missing int
Dear Gromacs users
I am facing this error during free energy calculation of protein-ligand for
which I have applied restrained to some atoms of protein residue and
ligand.
A list of missing interactions:
Restraint Pot. of 1 missing 1
Molecule type 'Protein'
the first 10 missing int
Dear Gromacs users
I need your suggestions regarding the calculation of free energy of binding
in of ligand protein-ligand complex in setting up the system.
I am performing binding free energy calculation following alchemical free
energy path. I added a single molecule type in topology for both pro
Dear Gromacs users
I want to run free energy calculation of a protein-ligand complex by
putting distance, angle and dihedral restraints between ligand and protein.
Before that, I run 1ns MD (without free energy input) in order to know that
my ligand restraints are working well or otherwise. However
Dear Gromacs users
I have a ligand in my protein for which I make rtp file and included this
in my local copy for force field as mentioned in gromacs manual. Also, I
added atom types in ffnonbonded.itp and atomtypes.atp atomtypes.atp added
residue under protein in residuetypes.dat
But I am getting
Hi Alessandra
I used it but top file extension is not supported. Should I give a combined
PDB file? I got ligand topology from an external server when I will give
combined PDB, it will give an error for not having these residues in the
database.
Could you please suggest which file should I give?
Thank you, Alessandra, for your reply.
I have a confusion here that when I merge the topology I will have to
reindex ligand atoms. *e.g *I have ligand topology starting with atom
number 1 and bond terms, angles, dihedrals have all the connectivity
numbering from 1 to so on. When I will change the
Hi gromacs users
I want to restraint distance, angles and dihedrals between atoms of two
different residues; In my case protein atom and ligand atom. Could anybody
suggest me the right way of doing it?
I have set topology file of complex as below:-
Include forcefield parameters
#include "amber99s
Thank you Bratin Kumar Das
But I have read in articles to specify three degrees of freedom for ligand
restraining ; i.e. during free energy calculation and how about setting
lambda values.
Could you please clear it a bit more.
Thanks
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the arch
I have a protein having two ligands, for which I want to calculate absolute
free energy. Could you please suggest me how should I set restraints for
two ligands simultaneously?
I am trying to do it the first time, any help would really be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Sadaf
--
Gromacs Users ma
Dear gromacs users,
I have a protein having two ligands, for which I want to calculate absolute
free energy. Could you please suggest me how should I set restraints for
two ligands simultaneously?
I am trying to do it the first time, any help would really be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Sadaf
58 matches
Mail list logo