Re: [gmx-users] Perturbing Proteins

2018-04-04 Thread Sanyam Kapoor
any MC style move set functionality. > > Mark > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:54 PM Sanyam Kapoor <san...@nyu.edu> wrote: > > > Hi Mark, > > > > I unfortunately don't have background in MD. Do you mind pointing me to > > relevant literature? I can take

Re: [gmx-users] Perturbing Proteins

2018-04-04 Thread Sanyam Kapoor
worried that I might change the topology to an exceptionally bad state. Also, could you point me to places in Gromacs that can help me do this kind of a thing? On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:42 PM Mark Abraham <mark.j.abra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:26 PM S

Re: [gmx-users] Perturbing Proteins

2018-04-04 Thread Sanyam Kapoor
; the system. That is, the system may not return to its > starting/unperturbed > > state within a short time interval, while nstcomm is applied at every > step > > on the system. Maybe Justin, Mark or the other developers/users can > comment > > it better than me. >

[gmx-users] Perturbing Proteins

2018-04-03 Thread Sanyam Kapoor
a simulation without any solvent addition, does it converge further or are those molecules already on some minimum energy value attainable? Please correct me if I miss some part of the molecular dynamics pipeline. -- Regards, Sanyam Kapoor Masters in Computer Science Courant Institute, New York