Dear Gromacs user,
I read from the Gromacs Manual (version 5.1.2) that, while fudgeLJ is used
only when
generate pairs is set to ‘yes’, fudgeQQ is always used.
1. If I set fudgeQQ = 0.0, will gromacs annulate the 1-4 interactions ?
2. If I explicitly insert a (Coulomb 1-4) scaling factor in my
Dear Gromacs user,
I read from the Gromacs Manual (version 5.1.2) that, while fudgeLJ is used
only when
generate pairs is set to ‘yes’, fudgeQQ is always used.
1. If I set fudgeQQ = 0.0, will gromacs annulate the 1-4 interactions ?
2. If I explicitly insert a (Coulomb 1-4) scaling factor in my
Hi Gromacs users,
I am using gromacs tool g_sas to calculate protein excluded volumes and I
noticed that it provides significant different excluded volume values when
compared to the new version gmx sasa tool. Does anyone know the reason of
this and which of the two tool is more reliable?
Thanks i