Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-07-31 Thread Elton Carvalho
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: Particle decomposition was removed from the code a long time ago. There are lots of places where work is split among threads. Interesting. Now I've got some catching up to do with the documentation and code. Thanks,

Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-07-31 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/30/15 3:14 PM, Elton Carvalho wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: There are as many DD cells as there are (thread-)MPI processes. These can be further subdivided into multiple OpenMP threads. What I was talking about above is the use of only

Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-07-30 Thread Elton Carvalho
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: There are as many DD cells as there are (thread-)MPI processes. These can be further subdivided into multiple OpenMP threads. What I was talking about above is the use of only OpenMP, e.g. mdrun -ntmpi 1 -nt X There is

Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-07-29 Thread Elton Carvalho
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Justin Lemkul jalem...@vt.edu wrote: On 6/25/15 2:46 PM, John Degenstein wrote: I suppose in retrospect that I could simply use a single processor which I think would reduce the number of DD cells and thus prevent this error. Or just use OpenMP

Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-07-15 Thread John Degenstein
Justin, Thanks for the response, I have started to use pure OpenMP parallelization which has solved the issue with DD. Somehow I missed this detail about domain decomposition when reading about parallelization with tMPI vs OpenMP. John On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Justin Lemkul

Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-06-25 Thread John Degenstein
Justin, Ok, so I decided to take a different path to solve this issue. Essentially, using the Berendsen Pcoupl the system should condense under high pressure. For some reason it does not seem to work very quickly at least. To get around this issue I running several steps of equilibration EM

Re: [gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-06-25 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 6/25/15 2:46 PM, John Degenstein wrote: Justin, Ok, so I decided to take a different path to solve this issue. Essentially, using the Berendsen Pcoupl the system should condense under high pressure. For some reason it does not seem to work very quickly at least. To get around this issue I

[gmx-users] Building a Larger Liquid Phase - Truncate 'Vacuum'

2015-06-19 Thread John Degenstein
Hello, I am trying to build a bigger liquid phase (1000) from a small cluster of molecules (125). So far I have succeeded in forming the small cluster of 125 molecules shown in the below image. This was after running gmx trjconv ... -pbc cluster -center to bring the molecules into the middle of