Re: [gmx-users] Equilibration at each temperature in simmulated annealing

2017-09-26 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, That's still not going to have any effect. You're probably referring to ref-t, which is exactly what simulated annealing is documented to replace. Mark On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 3:15 PM lan hoa Trinh wrote: > Thanks! sorry for the spelling error, I just meant tcoupl. > > Sent from my iPhone

Re: [gmx-users] Equilibration at each temperature in simmulated annealing

2017-09-26 Thread lan hoa Trinh
Thanks! sorry for the spelling error, I just meant tcoupl. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 26, 2017, at 6:30 AM, Mark Abraham wrote: > > Hi, > > It'll equilibrate if you leave it alone long enough at an annealing point, > as normal. See > http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2016.4/user-guide/

Re: [gmx-users] Equilibration at each temperature in simmulated annealing

2017-09-26 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, It'll equilibrate if you leave it alone long enough at an annealing point, as normal. See http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/2016.4/user-guide/mdp-options.html#simulated-annealing. I don't know what you mean by referring to the non-existent t_couple Mark On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 8:49 AM

[gmx-users] Equilibration at each temperature in simmulated annealing

2017-09-25 Thread Hoa Trinh
Hi all, I would like to cool my system from 200K to 100K via multiple intermediate temperatures and at each temperature, the system is equilibrated for a while before decreasing temperature. I am thinking of doing something like this: annealing_temp = 200 150 150 100 100 But I am afraid this is not