Dear Justin and Mark,
The define = -DPOSRES -DFLEXIBLE is correct and thank you so much for your
help.
Respectfully,
Iman
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:17 PM, Iman Ahmadabadi <
imanahmadabad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Justin,
>
> Because there is a movement on atoms that posres should act on
On 2/14/18 2:47 PM, Iman Ahmadabadi wrote:
Dear Justin,
Because there is a movement on atoms that posres should act on them, and
this condition doesn't occur when the flexible option is not used.
Restraints don't prevent movement, only disfavor it. Have you quantified
this in any way?
Dear Justin,
Because there is a movement on atoms that posres should act on them, and
this condition doesn't occur when the flexible option is not used.
Sincerely,
Iman
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Iman Ahmadabadi wrote:
> Dear Mark,
>
> I forgot the D in
On 2/14/18 12:18 PM, Iman Ahmadabadi wrote:
Dear Mark,
I forgot the D in -DPOSRES in the previous email. However I used the
"define = -DFLEXIBLE -DPOSRES" but it doesn't work and position restraint
was not applied on the atoms. Is there another way to solve the problem?
What proof can you
Dear Mark,
I forgot the D in -DPOSRES in the previous email. However I used the
"define = -DFLEXIBLE -DPOSRES" but it doesn't work and position restraint
was not applied on the atoms. Is there another way to solve the problem?
Respectfully,
Iman
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Iman Ahmadabadi
Hi,
Please copy and paste your attempts and the errors, if you want to get
effectively help. You can use
define = -DPOSRES -DFLEXIBLE
to combine them, and -POSRES is always wrong.
Mark
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:19 PM Iman Ahmadabadi
wrote:
> Dear Gromacs Users,
>
Dear Gromacs Users,
If I wanna use some flexible bonds and also use position restraint on some
other atoms, how should I do this? the error arises because 2 define =
-DFLEXIBLE and -POSRES is not allowed in the .mdp files.
Respectfully
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive