Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: Issue with parallel simulations in vacuum

2017-05-16 Thread Agusti Emperador
Thanks very much Mark In fact, the results that I find are pathological in the sense that the kinetic energy does not seem to be correctly distributed along the system: one of the proteins seems to be at much lower temperature than the other one (according to their conformational sampling; they ar

Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: Issue with parallel simulations in vacuum

2017-05-16 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, In GROMACS 4.6.6 we added a fatal error for Andersen+constraints+domain decomposition with more than one domain, because it gave a temperature that is obviously too high. So, I presume Michael Shirts never implemented it to work / tested it with particle decomposition, either. Fortunately, 60

Re: [gmx-users] Fwd: Issue with parallel simulations in vacuum

2017-05-16 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 5/16/17 7:26 AM, Agusti Emperador wrote: Dear GROMACS experts, I am simulating a system of two disordered proteins in vacuum. I use gromacs 4.6.5. The serial simulation works fine, but when I run it in parallel (2 processors) it gives seriously pathological results. I use particle decompos

[gmx-users] Fwd: Issue with parallel simulations in vacuum

2017-05-16 Thread Agusti Emperador
Dear GROMACS experts, I am simulating a system of two disordered proteins in vacuum. I use gromacs 4.6.5. The serial simulation works fine, but when I run it in parallel (2 processors) it gives seriously pathological results. I use particle decomposition and periodic boundary conditions, because