Re: [gmx-users] In vacuo MD

2017-06-15 Thread Mark Abraham
st.sys.kth.se [ > gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] on behalf of Justin > Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu] > Sent: 14 June 2017 21:57 > To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org > Subject: Re: [gmx-users] In vacuo MD > > On 6/14/17 4:36 AM, Linus Johannissen wrote: > > I'

Re: [gmx-users] In vacuo MD

2017-06-15 Thread Linus Johannissen
_ From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se [gromacs.org_gmx-users-boun...@maillist.sys.kth.se] on behalf of Justin Lemkul [jalem...@vt.edu] Sent: 14 June 2017 21:57 To: gmx-us...@gromacs.org Subject: Re: [gmx-users] In vacuo MD On 6/14/17 4:36 AM, Linus Johannissen wrote: > I'm t

Re: [gmx-users] In vacuo MD

2017-06-14 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 6/14/17 4:36 AM, Linus Johannissen wrote: I'm trying to run an in vacuo MD simulation using infinite non-bonding cutoffs, but Gromacs doesn't seem to be calculating the non-bonding interactions - the protein unfolds very rapidly and in the log file the LJ (SR) and Coulomb (SR) values are

[gmx-users] In vacuo MD

2017-06-14 Thread Linus Johannissen
I'm trying to run an in vacuo MD simulation using infinite non-bonding cutoffs, but Gromacs doesn't seem to be calculating the non-bonding interactions - the protein unfolds very rapidly and in the log file the LJ (SR) and Coulomb (SR) values are 0. Does it look like there's something wrong with