Re: [gmx-users] MD run failed..

2015-02-20 Thread HANNIBAL LECTER
Exactly. The reason I asked On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 2/20/15 1:01 PM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote: > >> Just out of curiosity what does -0.1 actually mean? >> >> > It means someone made a mistake :) It's not physically sensible. tau-t > should be a positive

Re: [gmx-users] MD run failed..

2015-02-20 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/20/15 1:01 PM, HANNIBAL LECTER wrote: Just out of curiosity what does -0.1 actually mean? It means someone made a mistake :) It's not physically sensible. tau-t should be a positive decimal or -1 to turn off coupling for that group. Using -0.1 doesn't make any sense. It's probably

Re: [gmx-users] MD run failed..

2015-02-20 Thread HANNIBAL LECTER
Just out of curiosity what does -0.1 actually mean? On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 2/20/15 6:51 AM, Kalyanashis Jana wrote: > >> Dear all, >> I am doing an MD simulation of a protein system. Energy minimization step >> has been completed smoothly but the position

Re: [gmx-users] MD run failed..

2015-02-20 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 2/20/15 6:51 AM, Kalyanashis Jana wrote: Dear all, I am doing an MD simulation of a protein system. Energy minimization step has been completed smoothly but the position restraint MD run is not running properly(after 500-900 steps have been stopped automatically). Even it has not shown any e

[gmx-users] MD run failed..

2015-02-20 Thread Kalyanashis Jana
Dear all, I am doing an MD simulation of a protein system. Energy minimization step has been completed smoothly but the position restraint MD run is not running properly(after 500-900 steps have been stopped automatically). Even it has not shown any error or anything. I have used a drug molecule in