Hi,
I agree with Hannes, these questions are not only pre-canned, but very
limited in scope, pretty much listing a few handy features that happen to
be advantages of discourse. Without any introductory/exploratory questions
I'm not even sure it's easy to interpret correctly what people write; e.g.
Hi Mark,
many thanks.
At the end it is really just a question if the user has flexibility
over how to visualise the communications. I'm happy to hear that the
old-fashioned email way would still have (some) support :-)
I hope you get sufficient feedback and support from the community.
Cheers,
Hi Hannes,
Yes, previous discussion has identified this as a likely key feature, and
thanks for adding confirmation of that. Discourse can be integrated with
functionality for replying to threads from email to suit people who want
that kind of small change to their workflows; that will indeed suit
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:11:42 +
Mark Abraham wrote:
> Hi people,
>
> As part of the new BioExcel project (http://bioexcel.eu/) that
> supports biomolecular research with codes including GROMACS, we're
> exploring migrating the gmx-users mailing list to the Discourse
> format. You can see an e
Hi people,
As part of the new BioExcel project (http://bioexcel.eu/) that supports
biomolecular research with codes including GROMACS, we're exploring
migrating the gmx-users mailing list to the Discourse format. You can see
an example at http://try.discourse.org! This has a number of immediate
ad
