Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-10 Thread Dawid das
Hi, O'right, I will take a closer look. Thank you! 2015-08-10 10:11 GMT+01:00 Mark Abraham : > Hi, > > OK, that sounds good. I ran your speedyshare files just fine with 4.6.7, so > I think you are not using the files you think you are using. > > Mark > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:30 AM Dawid da

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-10 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, OK, that sounds good. I ran your speedyshare files just fine with 4.6.7, so I think you are not using the files you think you are using. Mark On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:30 AM Dawid das wrote: > Well, the *itp file says: > > #ifdef FLEXIBLE > > and there is bunch of lines defining proper pa

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-10 Thread Dawid das
Well, the *itp file says: #ifdef FLEXIBLE and there is bunch of lines defining proper parameters, so I assumed this is it. 2015-08-10 6:26 GMT+01:00 Mark Abraham : > You've *tried* to use flexible water. But does your water itp file *have* a > flexible implementation that your approach will tri

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Mark Abraham
You've *tried* to use flexible water. But does your water itp file *have* a flexible implementation that your approach will trigger? Mark On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 19:42 Dawid das wrote: > 2015-08-09 18:27 GMT+01:00 Mark Abraham : > > > > > Justin's advice is true only if your water topology has a fle

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Dawid das
2015-08-09 18:25 GMT+01:00 Justin Lemkul : > Are you using some old version? Note that your cutoff setup is wrong for > CHARMM force fields. Well, to be honest I do use quite and old version which is 4.6.7. Yes I am aware of that I use wrong CHARMM force field cutoff setup and values. I have do

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Dawid das
2015-08-09 18:27 GMT+01:00 Mark Abraham : > > Justin's advice is true only if your water topology has a flexible > implementation. Check it Yes, I do use flexible water and still this causes problem. -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Mark Abraham
Hi, Justin's advice is true only if your water topology has a flexible implementation. Check it. Mark On Sun, 9 Aug 2015 17:41 Dawid das wrote: > Dear Justin, > > I still have problems with performing l-bfgs minimization. > I use > > constraints = none ; no constraints > define

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/9/15 1:17 PM, Dawid das wrote: I hope speedy share is fine. http://www.speedyshare.com/k2YEr/ribonucl-no-constr.tar.gz Works for me with the latest GROMACS. Are you using some old version? Note that your cutoff setup is wrong for CHARMM force fields. See http://www.gromacs.org/Doc

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Dawid das
I hope speedy share is fine. http://www.speedyshare.com/k2YEr/ribonucl-no-constr.tar.gz 2015-08-09 18:08 GMT+01:00 Justin Lemkul : > > > On 8/9/15 11:40 AM, Dawid das wrote: > >> Dear Justin, >> >> I still have problems with performing l-bfgs minimization. >> I use >> >> constraints

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 8/9/15 11:40 AM, Dawid das wrote: Dear Justin, I still have problems with performing l-bfgs minimization. I use constraints = none ; no constraints define = -DFLEXIBLE in my *mdp file and in *top file there is nothing related to constraints. I still get this

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-08-09 Thread Dawid das
Dear Justin, I still have problems with performing l-bfgs minimization. I use constraints = none ; no constraints define = -DFLEXIBLE in my *mdp file and in *top file there is nothing related to constraints. I still get this error that l-bfgs and constraints are no

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-07-29 Thread Dawid das
2015-07-29 12:36 GMT+01:00 Justin Lemkul : > To turn that off you would need "define = -DFLEXIBLE" but you should > subsequently re-minimize with constraints to avoid weird geometries. I forgot about it. Thank you! Dawid Grabarek -- Gromacs Users mailing list * Please search the archive at

Re: [gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-07-29 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 7/29/15 7:30 AM, Dawid das wrote: Dear Gromacs Experts, I am trying to run l-bfgs minimization with following options (apart from others): integrator = l-bfgs ; (other: cg, l-bfgs) constraints = none ; no constraints but I still get a message that l-bfgs does no

[gmx-users] None constraints and l-bfgs.

2015-07-29 Thread Dawid das
Dear Gromacs Experts, I am trying to run l-bfgs minimization with following options (apart from others): integrator = l-bfgs ; (other: cg, l-bfgs) constraints = none ; no constraints but I still get a message that l-bfgs does not work with constraints so I should eithe